Portrait of Ulanova
 

Check please.
GS Vereisky. portrait Galina Ulanova. litografiya.1950g

  The reaction was not ponyal.rastolkuyte.

And the fact that you're in his first message that a redacted (the size of your portrait and the time of its creation), and now you become the same with the portrait, which is listed in the link :) "only there is a signature the details in the lower right corner, unlike your :confused:

Well, suppose a year, I have not changed, he's in the back has already been shown. The proportions of paper do not matter, it is printed. It would be interesting to measure the size of the image (the head). A signature is seen. I have not thought that it was made in stone, in mirror image so a signature is not prosto.Svoi lithography I always signed in pencil. And then yesterday I had a portrait in his hands. I had a portrait made in the technique of lithography. make a copy on the stone stupid.
(though have a closer look)

nikola, this portrait of Ulanova in Vereisk itself is very small in comparison with his other lithographs-portraits.

I had several jobs, including those with expertise V. Silaeva - I have some here showed
(one remaining, but a virtuoso on the execution, in my - and not just - look, will be on Gelos in January or February, if not mistaken)

So, they all signed, as you say, in pencil on the front side, and at work, as shown by you, in addition to being on the back, and she does the signature "nevereyskaya"
so be careful.

And the stones, if they survived, sometimes used with unscrupulous intentions, as lithographs K. Rudakov (on the forum about this, too, writing)