The economic theory of culture in Russia?
 

How do you think is necessary if economic theory of culture in our country?

Is there such a thing in high schools?

Are there any specialists?

Can a developing trend in economic theory to improve Russia art market?

Sovershenno neobhodima.

vall, I think that any theory of interest and need, in general, even the theory.
A really economical, much less ...
Well, but still   -double interest, is seen as ... Me. : D

(Say, that gives your poll? Or can give and why you created it? Would you like something to this survey taught couple of thoughts on his creation of the forum. Why did this poll for you? Do you have that something in this "economic theory of culture?" You are prepared to voice it here?)

Why reinvent the wheel?
 

One of the most prominent pioneers of the economic theory of culture was, of course, Judas Iscariot. A faithful son of his people, he monetise its closeness to the Savior, put it on the scales on the one hand - an emerging Christian culture, but on the other - 30 pieces of silver - an amount that allows time to buy a small plot of land in the vicinity of Jerusalem. A byproduct of the transaction, in his view, was to be the strengthening of stability of the Jewish society and the Empire as a whole.
  However, experience has proved to be unsuccessful ... without going into the intricacies of economic theory, and while in captivity retarded metaphysical beliefs, and Judah was forced to lay hands on himself, admitting de facto primacy to the heavenly partite.
  In the middle of the XIX century Karl Marx has finally and irrevocably set the record straight i, postulating and proving the primacy of the material and the universality of market relations in every aspect of human activity. From now on, everything can be bought and sold everything legitimately, and a traders' market was not exactly no reason for reflection, especially for suicide.
  Since then, any cultural process becomes not only justified but necessary, if the result is a surplus value. Surplus value - the new God of society. For his "Church", temples, priests, religious sects and other attributes ...
  There even Hesychasts, meaning that the service - a continuous prayer of the new deity. There are textbooks isichasm, authored by the apostles of the new faith - Dale Carnegie, Napoleon Hill and others like them, which - darkness ...

  Therefore, the establishment of a special discipline - economics of culture - is, in my opinion, quite far-fetched. Culture in a totally new society develops the method of "generation of meaning" and their further resale. From this point of view paintings as objects of market relations, are no different diapers or expensive cars. The very theory of the problem has been extensively studied and tested for over a century. The advantage of the modern economy to patriarchal based on the fact that the freely-traded "meaning" do not have to be mined in the mines, do not have to be treated, do not have to transport, store, etc.
  Enough "sgenererovat meaning" stick it to any subject, befitting the occasion to bring the victim in the form of advertising and wait for results ... Even the education for this economic activity is not required of priests. Only Faith. Faith in money, the belief in lack of spirituality, belief in the total barbarism ...
  It is naive to believe that the current paradigm of the producer of cultural property (eg, artist) play any prominent place. Latter not even means of production, not an instrument of labor. He - raw materials, clay for the true "creators" of cultural property.

Brad some! Judas Iscariot shuffled (again! "Son of his people! Same pripevki!). All post sucked from a finger with a single purpose ... Neither the economy nor the culture of any sideways! A very interesting topic - the economy of culture! I'd love to read the views of experts!

There is no nonsense. The original parallel. Is there any sense in such parallels? Here on "light" approval is enough "sgenererovat meaning» is worth considering. Is it just a thing - to generate meaning? It's like the old movie "Spring", the hero Rastislav Plyat says: - "And they can only sit, think and discover."

In this "parallel" does not make sense. "The emerging Christian culture" - has come into being over a hundred years after Christ's death (and the consequent? Suicide of Judas), and only thanks to the work (in the literal sense) of the apostles Peter and Paul, who created Christianity as the religion of (part culture). The traitor Judas - Traitor to the point of view of the followers of Christ, ie his apostles. From the standpoint of the then authorities of Judea and its people, he was a loyal citizen and loyal.
Binding of Judah in the "Christian culture" far-fetched. Sleazebag, who laid the authorities suspect a philosopher, and received for his denunciation of the money - that's what Judas. Even the allusions to Christian culture and Christian religion did not yet exist. Christ is not intended to create a new religion. This is done through a hundred years after him. And much to the "establishment" culture started even later.

Production of meanings is also put on a commercial basis. Meanings are baked as cakes. The paradox is that the artificial, like the homunculus grown in vitro, "meaning" may not contain any sense at all:). For the "production process" is based not on metaphysics, which implies the existence of higher meaning and trying to get close to his understanding, and the physics in the form of physiology. Naturally, the final product is completely empty shell, and therefore absolutely not important its contents. All that matters is how effectively it can affect hormone (digestive, urinary and pr ...) a system of rights. And finally - to be derived from the product profit.

The scheme is as follows. In retort adds some idea, albeit generated by the brain of patients (for example - to walk down the street without pants), diluted with a kind of discourse - any casuistic hastily hired by justification (for example - in contact with nature, civil liberties, etc.) and everything is cooked in a large amount of money. The result usually occurs very quickly. Retort breaks and a new homunculus (sense) continues to exist independently, for example - in the form of a new fashion ...

Hello
Thank you for your interest in the topic!
try to answer your questions:
Tell me, what makes your poll? Or can give? - A survey in principle, is a tool for drawing attention to the topic.

Why did you created it? - According to his service engaged in strategic state. projects and was surprised that the economic theory of development of the country is not given direction, the survey results will attract the attention of interested entities to the topic, so to speak the voice of the people!

Thanks

p.s.

I feel that that the vector sure!

Wow! Call at least one (probably Olympiad).