Our recent history - Exhibition of 30 years MOSH
 

Propose forumcanam lay out the work of artists who participated in the jubilee exhibition in the arena. Who that is.
Beginner collectors and fans, I think it will be interesting.

Stozharau VF "Isady. Crossing." H.m.105 x 160, 1960 Ivanovo Regional Museum of Art.
Stozharau VF "Galich. Soup." Oil on canvas 125 x 150, 1962 Tver Regional Art Gallery.
Stozharau VF "Galich. Fisherman's settlement." Oil on canvas 102 x 216, 1962 Krasnoyarsk Art Museum. VISurikova.
Stozharau VF "New North." Oil on canvas 1962 96 x 128, Volgograd Museum of Fine Arts.

Stozharau a Russian, a remarkable artist, romantic, our lovely "old style and primitive" margins.

Sasha is difficult for you hope ..
-------------------------------------------------- -------
Exhibition 30 years MOSKh (Nina Moleva, professor, doctor of historical sciences, Ph.D.)

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=4335

After all, what is the painting! There can be a lover of social realism or not be them, but the painting can not remain indifferent, and there was no longer "works" statement respected fross of despair and boredom "from the contemplation of kilometers of fields, rivers, huts ... Thank you, dedulya, somehow Stozharau more for me opened.

Boredom and despair in no color, nor in the composition of (in my opinion, a master of composition), nor in the style of ...- amazing, it would seem, in late autumn or early spring, standing in the cold, knee-deep in mud ....: ) - and yet no!

Dear Gala, recommend:

http://www.artlib.ru/index.php?id=11...p;user_serie =

Here are some of the dog show participants.

"To love or not love socialist realism" - not too generalized?
 

Dear Gala, if you do not cut the phrase Fross, at the beginning of which stood "in spite of the undisputed masters of individual skill, then it is not plotting to" work "against the good realistic painting of the Soviet period to which the Stozharau. I would like also to note that all these works Stozharov, based on dating, written in a period of thaw, when the canon of Stalinist social realism (from 1936 to 1954) was already significantly "eroded", has become less rigid, allowing the formalist indulgences. This is "not the" socialist realism. If the period of Stalin's personality managed to save only genius, but in the second half of the 50's - early 60's to look not so boring just emerged from talented artists, and, consequently, the specific mass of "boredom and despair" in the painting, which said Fross, significantly decreased.
Not in order of "clinging to the words", but still:-stamp the phrase "You can like or dislike socialist realism" it is desirable to use more caution. In socialist realism was a lot of nuances that this non-deployed the phrase "either ... or" do not count. Here it is necessary to clarify what work we have in mind and in what context: the ideological order, or "silent art", which many socialist realists were writing for themselves and their colleagues as vents from "imminent harm". In this gap really is a lot of good! Once again - nothing personal to the Gala - a general call ..

Dear Munch, did not want to belittle the saying fross or expose it to a "zamyshlenii" I well remember the beginning and, moreover, agrees with her, because she tired of the "contemplation of kilometers" colorless and soulless landscapes, and at this artist Thank God, "it does not work"
Well, what if there are those who do not like the Soviet period, its performance in realistic! Just as I was, like, well, I do not like classical realism, with its brown glaze and the substrate (what I like to start with the Impressionists and other modernistic currents, ie the appearance of color and freedom of form). I looked, I agree, but ... love or just look and calmly accept (without emotion, it had in view) - it's still different things.
I understand perfectly the difference between socialist realism and painting of the Soviet period, in t.ch.realisticheskoy, but, unfortunately, even here on the site for the rate of expression of thought all of this is denoted by one word ...:)
Thank you for the call, let us be more cautious

I think our art as something not very creative approach to describing the directions of Russian art of XX century. If someone has created a system similar to that described by LCR in our forum for foreign art, that many authors would have received a new meaning and significance.
After all, the price level could rise much higher if the distribution of lead is not on the basis of the first row, second row and all the others, but in ways that you can not create two or three rather than one dozen. From a scientific point of view it would be possible and not very correct, but the market is a necessary system of coordinates.

The idea is very good. I think such a system is, but it is good to put on your site. Then there will be any work of this period (not even close to relevant) to be called socialist realism. Art historians call. (I am from the artists:))