Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   RS 1886 (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=42036)

Владислав 17.09.2009 00:48

RS 1886
 
Вложений: 4
Painting oil on cardboard, size 28,5 x45 cm by signing discernible letters RS and the year 1886. The painting was acquired in a second store in 1960 (according to the owner of the painting). Perhaps it Sudkovsky Rufin Gavrilovich, but then it turns out not interfacing for years (such as a signature in 1886), he died in 1885, most likely it is someone else. Help please identify the artist and the approximate cost.

Aleks-art 17.09.2009 01:38

Signed seems set much later than painted, probably in these 60E gody.S HC ..

ANTIK 17.09.2009 21:33

Fufel .........

Владислав 18.09.2009 23:09

Can justify
 
or you believe in something??

allexx 19.09.2009 10:44

!
 
Цитата:

Сообщение от Aleks-art (Сообщение 608206)
Signed seems set much later than paint a picture, probably in these 60E gody.S HC ..

Цитата:

Сообщение от ANTIK (Сообщение 609486)
Fufel .........

That's where this positiveness, and. I have not heard of such a specialty as an expert on photography. Is that psychics. What can not be correct to observe? Man, however, the Board asks.

Konstantin 19.09.2009 11:15

allexx,
You all watched this chapter? That photo and go score. Those who are asking questions that probably looked at before this that there is, and how and if it means asking people want to hear the answer to the question, rather than reasoning can or can not. And then the answers here are not the expertise and opinion.
Another thing you need to watch who is responsible.
ANTIK prokomentiruyte, please, your answer (if you can, of course).

раскатов 19.09.2009 12:19

Вложений: 4
Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin (Сообщение 612396)
And then the answers here are not the expertise and opinions.

Yes, I too believe that we should show the example of pictures Sudkovskogo.
Here are three samples. Last signed with the left side - in 1874 and the initials: Court.
And at the end of our with the initials: RS 1886. , Marked the latest, top of the paint layer.

allexx 19.09.2009 19:25

?
 
Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin (Сообщение 612396)
allexx,
You all watched this chapter? That photo and go score.
Another thing you need to watch who is responsible.
ANTIK prokomentiruyte, please, your answer (if you can, of course).

Constantine, I'm aware of the rules. Simply, in my opinion, monosyllabic answers require comment, otherwise it does not answer. As they say, there is no stupid questions, there are stupid answers.
PS Cease flame.

sergejnowo 19.09.2009 23:43

Цитата:

Сообщение от allexx (Сообщение 612366)
That's where this positiveness, and. I have not heard of such a specialty as an expert on photography. Is that psychics. What can not be correct to observe? Man, however, the Board asks.

Sky no.
Sea no.
Beach /stones are flat, not without problems with proportion.
This board (base) favorite material for the replica.
The paint layer without a hint of krakyuler, but with a suspicious Jelnov dirt on the surface.
Not the fact that this modern replica - on my pigments old.
For me it is not.

SAH 20.09.2009 00:14

Цитата:

Сообщение от sergejnowo (Сообщение 613816)
Not the fact that this modern replica - on my old pigments.

It looks like a 40-50gg .- 20 th century. Signed seems set recently.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 13:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot