Rate hare!
 

Over the weekend, shot a rabbit!
P. Kovalevsky, cardboard, oil, 31h22, 5 cm, 1864. Examination of the Russian Museum.
How much nowadays such rabbits? :)

SergeiSK, a conclusion which is dated? This is without pitfalls ask:)

Barbarians! poor hare, soup or stew?

The question really is not an idle question.
On the one hand and Conclusion name, with another student's work "as a creative artist's manner has not yet arisen" Here, perhaps more illustrative biographical value than artistic.

The document has no date of issue is invalid. Yes, and ref. Number on the document should be.

Well, the date, say postavit.A forgotten about the original, so - as his record? Paper issued by the institution and not a group of individuals referred to themselves as experts, a fact of which the museum confirmed "the engineer "(????) personnel department and the seal of the personnel department.
Probably so tried to circumvent bans ... Received several comic-what is the average between the "expert" opinion and "help" the fact of work.

Roman-Korsakov's a whole museum's worth, and what is printing OK, this is common, prescribed regulations. Just this and says the official examination.
I am interested in the date
SergeiSK, the conclusion of the year? Not see? You have only one sheet?

Gentlemen
You have answered all the questions:) Findings RM letterhead with water marks are not issued for about two to three years. But you can quite officially ordered examination in SRM and get exactly that conclusion, what you see here. And you understand that the opinion of Rimsky-Korsakov more expensive than any form of printing. At this Kovalevsky examination was obtained in 2007. I can assure that it is real, as the authorship of Kovalevsky.

You're on familiar terms with all the experts of the country and the world! They're all you Svetka Mih.Mihi etc. Call the State Russian Museum, and they all tell. If they deem it necessary. A better self-examination will get there and then tell about it peace ...

What rules? Where and when it became commonplace? So, if there is no press OK - expertise is not valid? Inventions.
I have seen and ekspertizy.Vse letterhead institutions, with all rekvizitov.Podpisi - experts, art historians, the signature of the head of the organization, the date stamp. And the same registration number with the signature of the person responsible for registratsiyu.Ni what engineers and assistant warden is not a trace .

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
There is somneniy.Oboshli silly bans - understandable!. Only now have a date set.

Agree. I saw several similar findings in Ginet, Beggrova and someone else, can not remember. All without a date! I see no reason not to put a date, but it does not write! I have a few private examinations, expert consultations, the Tretyakov Gallery. Same without dates.