Unpromoted naive artist
 

Help resolve my doubts. Most recently began collecting collection Naiva exclusively for home use (Well prolong me), and in this way met with such proposals:

1. Petersburg naive artist Julia Andreyevna Vasilyeva, now deceased. She worked as a cleaner, paint, and much copied by introducing a copy of the original naive coloring. From the press release for her exhibition "She likes to make copies of pictures, and copies only those pictures that she most liked, most people, and landscapes. In this case it of little interest to the original author's name. Anyway, she does everything in its own way."
After the death of several dozen of her works were in one of the famous Saint-Petersburg galleries. Prices - from $ 1000 to 2500. If not mistaken, exhibited almost the only time in the same gallery in runet information is extremely small.

2. Buryat artist primitive Polycarp Ermolaevich Sudomoykin. Open the head of the Fund's ethnogeographical research, he also helped in 2007 to organize an exhibition in Central House of Artists. http://mk.burnet.ru/index.php?option...iew&id=503
Asked about the price the answer was "1000 euros"

Help understanding adequate to tell me whether the price of talented, charming (to my taste) the work of unknown artists?

Prices for contemporary art in the range of $ 500-3000.
Why you ask? Will prices rise or is it something? The first question is - hardly. On the second - Comm. Below $ 500 probably will not return. If you're building for yourself - Bargain and buy time like that.

 
Sergeyitch skoee second - is it worth the money, or just feel sorry for the owners to part with masterpieces, and that's "pulled up" ... Thank you for your reply!

ProstoFeya, "naive" interesting perception of the world with strange people who buy ink and paper ... and begin to paint, not knowing how to do it. Copies of the same in this "genre", in my opinion, have no value. It is not even a caricature.
Here you clean naive - in form, but not in relation to life ...

Looked. Vassiliev seemed to me not naive. Just painting, still life, quite decent. But I would not have bought this.

I think that is very dear to you, ask. First, I would never have appreciated, the second and third from 100 to 200 dollars depending on the format. Well, if you really like - 300. I do not care about me at Petrograd gallery and exhibition in Central House of Artists. There is sometimes exhibit! But whether you're ready to buy a box of rubbish, if he stayed several years in the Tretyakov Gallery? Or poorly painted door?

Artists - thousands and thousands. Little-known faces from 300 to 500 dollars for the good work with oil medium. If on paper and small - from 50 up to 100 ye. Outlook personally I do not see presented - rather untwisted professional artist than unprofessional. However, it is a lottery.

It is better to buy paper and ink of the sick artist, about which you wrote a couple of weeks earlier. Let draws - and make a noble cause, and a picture will get very expensive.

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, agree with you. And the council is correct, man.

heir, and what kind of artist?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]
Chernomashentsev Vladimir pleased that you remember:) I paint it bought, and is committed to the future to try to help:) Of course, this is better.
As I mentioned artists - many thanks for your assessment, I was able to for another look at it! I'll keep your words in my head in the future.

Join the Council. And if you do not want to get pictures of it to these authors, but just like the naive look here http://artnow.ru/ru /genre/0/g289.html and on the prices, notice immediately understandable prices.

subscribe to the opinion of Vladimir. I did not like the work and the prices too. In my opinion, better work Lucy Voronova buy (if I lived in Russia, must be bought 2.3). Moreover, it comes to the forum.

Of course, the better! I myself a huge fan of Lucy Voronova. Here only in the gallery prices for its work - several orders of magnitude higher than anyone unknown Sudomoykina and Andreeva, at least in the gallery, where I was treated. This is understandable - she was an excellent artist:)