![]() |
Linguistic question
Here is a quote from the article I just read:
"go anywhere, we are not going to hand out trophies. We'll see what kind of trophies and so on why the Georgian side to left, but she had abandoned them. Basically weapons recycle. There are weapons in sufficient quantities and to be honest we do not need the weapons that have received here, "- said the general". What does the word "Recycle"? By implication, he seems to mean "destroy", but it is very strange, because "utiliser" in French - "to enjoy and use. Explain, please! |
probably not completely "destroyed"; recycle - use anything unnecessary to use household or industrial waste to benefit by finding their application.
recycle - France. utiliser, Syn: use, consume |
But darling, my Tamilochka:) on context like not get?
Frankly speaking - the phrase master general I was very puzzled: confused: Incidentally, you will, of course, can not remember, but was formerly a tepmin - scrap raw material, "he meant, I think all sorts of rags, which were for recycling, in general, something vrome textile equivalent of junk. |
I am not a linguist, but my father - a retired military officer:) By recycling certainly understood that sawed and remelting. There are also entire enterprise for utilization of equipment and ammunition. Blowing them can not, but there is a complex processing technology. The word is really elusive, but likely will go on the mind: something in the furnace, something on the training base (the NATO weapons after all), and some of that and for special assignments may be useful:)
I just look at kototory Nagovitsyna and marvel at what he is clever. Where are they such an officer in the General Staff unearthed? Face of the military, but it professor. Every day the press conference. With him sitting next referent, but more time resting. Periodically, the idea throws all. A Nagovitsyn Shparo and шпарит: figures, texture, historical analogies, calm, balanced, no foul language and emotions. In order to juggle both facts and figures require serious training time. When he has time? Just diva dayus. |
Цитата:
"Something in the furnace, something on the training base (the NATO weapons after all), and some of that and for special assignments may be useful" Absolutely agree with Vladimir. Some weapons will take the samples for the study of trainees (and even to explore new technologies, technical solutions, many times already so it was - remember the automobile industry) Some weapons can be dismantled for parts, if our samples. And if they do, and under our own fire hit, then they will learn "weaknesses" to defeat, then to correct the shortcomings of engineers. Part of weapons to blow up all his Nelia could use to anyone (then, however, will sell for scrap metal) Hence, Liana, follows the old-new business - Waste, which you rightly mentioned. And in general, military - people are resourceful, something nibed invent. |
Offtop about weapons
I immediately think of reportage, in which our military gladly talked about the NATO weapons - such as a convenient, easy, high-tech, but this is unreliable. Type in the battle trash. They cited an example - rifle from lightweight alloy is very light (in my M4, but I can lie) fell from a height of board of "KAMAZ" and split in half. Or a machine gun, which produced 45 tape cartridges and barrel "led". And then I remembered the arguments about 10 years ago. Were compared m16 assault rifle and our "Kalash". Well, he says m16 on the characteristics of accuracy, range, and so had a substantial advantage. But Kalash was one of the most convincing - the price. m16 seems to cost about $ 1500, and the Kalashnikov - about 500.
Authentically you? For that he bought for it and sell:) In army weapons are not an expert, but I can tell you about hunting. Imported guns for quality superior to our guns on all counts, except for the price (import comparable grades are 4-5 times more expensive than Russian). There is a true mythical custom rifle manufactured in Russia, and which are th-th. But it did not compare correctly. Italian or German you take a gun in hand - can be seen that lovingly done. And about this we can not say. In general, as with cars, and with rifles. |
This past Sunday watched on NTV transfer "Their manners" - a repeat of some of the past issues with the plot about Yemen. Here is his announcement from the site ihnravy.ru:
Цитата:
|
Reminiscent of the story narrated by a friend who works as a programmer and wrote all sorts of programs for the defense .... did some mega program and presented it either general, or colonel .. not what they say ... such a program and raztakaya fairly simple that's why the reliable, their counterparts are not equal, even superior, plus cheaper and stuff like that. The presentation took place somewhere almost in a tank firing range, so that was naturalistic. The program itself was installed on an armored (sorry) laptop. There is a presentation, one crucified about the program, and the general (let's general) said: what if the computer falls into the mud and it will be a company of soldiers? friend: well, okay, he then and shockproof, the program does not hurt, blah blah blah ... but what if there is a fire? but not terrible, not burn, the program will not hurt ... and then the question: what if a direct hit from a tank at close range? one thought, and realizing that the program in general, nobody cares about, sadly stated: "Well, if a direct hit from a tank at close distances, then, perhaps, the program will not work ......!" general left dissatisfied, said, "Poor program!"
|
Proizvodstvo AKM v sovetskii period stoilo 47 rublei.
Tehnicheskie dannye i neprihotlivost 'potriasauschie. Mozno vynut 'iz luzi i srasu streliat'. |
Do not miss out if we have a linguistic nuance, which indicates Latin utilitas - "benefit, profit"?
Since profits can be expressed in money, the "recycling" of weapons and it may involve the sale of ... |
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 00:36. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.