Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Exhibitions and events (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   Pipiski Jacques Charlier - mysteries on the art of the twentieth century (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=39786)

LCR 23.08.2009 12:35

Pipiski Jacques Charlier - mysteries on the art of the twentieth century
 
Translating this story is already well known to you Arri Bella, I suffered a question: where to place this story? On the one hand, the coverage of the exhibition, so it makes sense to hang it in the appropriate section. On the other - this is, like, riddles, you can invite them to our local experts, atributoram - they are not seen (though not, generally speaking, this still did not see it: shy:).
In general, put it in the "Exhibition" and the administration at his discretion may provide a link to it in other sections, so that no one missed this enticing material.


Pipiski Jacques Charlier - mysteries on the art of the twentieth century.

Le Monde, 31.07.09.

Arri Belle


Male prichandal Byurrena, ready for action, equal to 8.7 cm in circumference. This is the exact size of the strips, which the sculptor owes his fame. At least, so imagine his Belgian artist Jacques Charlier, who from 1973-th year working on is finally finished a series of 100 genital artists.
Читать дальше... 
rough idea of these figures Charlier could get on the opening day of the Venice biiennale. Approximate, as they appear on the TV screen mounted on a boat, hired specially for the occasion.

The exhibition was improvised because the artist, whose Enrico Lunghi, director of the Museum of Modern Art in Luxembourg, has selected French-speaking population in Belgium, was a victim of censorship - first from the Biennale, which has refused to include it in their program, and then - the municipality of Venice banned Jacques Charlier hang out in the city playing his works, "not to insult the modesty residents.

Nobody thought that the people of Venice seem to be similarly increased modestly. As the organizers of the Biennale, it seems, they did not understand what contemporary art is simply die if it is to take yourself too seriously. And most importantly: as noted in his submission to the Minister of Culture of the French population in Belgium, despite the intention of the city authorities of Venice, this decision focused on the banned works of general interest - pipiski Jacques Charlier, in general it is quite harmless, were the subject of lively debate audience: people fortunate enough to see them, describe them to others, often in the most laudatory terms.

But everyone knows: it is better to see once than seven times to hear. Now it has become possible - in the Palace of Fine Arts in Brussels he devoted an exhibition open until September 13. A series of 100 genital art "in some sense represents a lesson for contemporary art, or better said, the riddle on the history of art: drawings, representing the attribute of every artist, not realistic, and represent a metaphor of his work.
Thus, prichandal Cristo packed attribute Herring is covered with graffiti, and Hearst pipisku (of course, and the urge to write "Hearst dick" - but I'm afraid the authorities would not approve, or simply trample me with a forum, so I think I will refrain) , suffered the same fate as his calves - it is cut into pieces, like a sausage. As Koons, his masculine pride like a balloon: as expected, it is filled with air. Among the few women elected creators: it may be noted handsome, though not too inventive flower of Georgia O'Keefe.

In truth, Charlier series deserves to be used it on the entrance exams in the School of the Louvre.
Everyone can become a party to this game and test their knowledge of the art of the twentieth century on the site Charlier: www.jacquescharlier-venise2009.be.

"100 genital artists, Bozar, Palace of Fine Arts in Brussels, 23 st. Ravenshtayna. Tel. (00-32) (0) 2-507-82-00.


Маруся 23.08.2009 15:48

Цитата:

Сообщение от LCR (Сообщение 565706)
A series of 100 genital art "in some sense represents a lesson for contemporary art, or better said, the riddle on the history of art: drawings, representing the attribute of every artist, not realistic, and represent a metaphor his work.

A contemporary art without such "mysteries" (sharks, turtles, piles g. ..) can not exist? And the art of it? More like - anything - for your money "...

Konstantin 23.08.2009 15:59

Цитата:

And the art of it?
Maroussia on this forum about your question so many copies of the mangled that you want to relax and get udovlstvie. Or do not watch.

Маруся 23.08.2009 16:13

Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin (Сообщение 566006)
about your question so many copies of the mangled that you want to relax and get udovlstvie.

The question was not whether the art of it, but rather whether the contemporary art without ooboytis this!
Each fall is the "bounce-up" just a deeper fall, the less likely it is to jump out and say in the arts.

Veronic 23.08.2009 18:18

Цитата:

Сообщение от Maroussia (Сообщение 566046)
The question was not whether the art of it, but rather whether the contemporary art without this ooboytis!

What did you mean "Without this"?

Маруся 23.08.2009 19:00

Veronique, I am hoping that clearly put it: without pipisek, sharks, turtles, and other piles of shit and ...
I am interested in, remained there in contemporary art and other topics.

Veronic 23.08.2009 19:11

Maroussia, well, in general, pipiski can be seen not only in contemporary art. Here's how it is an innocent example of the work of Gustave Courbet "Start Peace" among other things hanging in Orsay and the children watched. Look for Google image here will not put (shy: shy:)

"From what the monster could happen ... the bastard by the name of Gustave Courbet? Under any cap on what a dung heap, watered with a mixture of wine, beer, poisonous saliva and stinking phlegm, germinated this windbag and hairy gourd, the belly, pretending to be a man and artist, is the embodiment of idiotic and impotent "I"? "- (Alexander Dumas)




But the heap shit ", it does not know, I think that the present invention in the arts ....

fross 23.08.2009 19:41

Funny cartoons, I addition to the above is only Murakami and Wesselmann recognized, so that the test did not dare:) The cartoons of these completely innocent here, for example, compared with the "masterpiece" of the same Murakami lone cowboy. And last sold for $ 15 million.: D:)

Jasmin 23.08.2009 20:12

Цитата:

Сообщение от Veronic (Сообщение 566246)
pipiski can be seen not only in contemporary art.

Toulouse-Lautrec also portrayed them, genius!

Vladimir 23.08.2009 21:46

To understand it, what participants say
 
Вложений: 2
Gustave Courbet. The origin of the world. 1866. Musée d'Orsay, Paris.
Takashi Murakami (Takashi Murakami). My lone cowboy (My Lonesome Cowboy). 1998

Courbet bold. Especially for my 1866. Murakami - IMHO, no.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 12:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot