Exhibition "Thaw and time after. Moscow Artists 1958-2008"
 

Exhibition Berlin gallery Sandmann attracted the attention of labor, which in my opinion is well illustrated by our discussions in the arbor (sm.podpisi under the photo).:)
About the exhibition, which will last until October 24 can be read here http://www.artsandmann.de/russian/au...hibitions.html

The first miniature weakly expressed emotion in the "alcove." Second - Look closely reflects the most quiet and thoughtful participants. But the third - perfect for fights and squabbles!

The question - whether the error in translation?
I think that word artists are not suitable for the authors of these works:

1) More looks like a poster. Artist-poster artist.
2) Sculpture.
3) poster? Cartoon?

Vladimir, the artists represented at the exhibition "The Thaw and time after. Moscow Artists 1958-2008" is the pride of Russia .. It's not just artists, and painters.

It not understand why before questions can not be spread on the Internet information search? It reduces interest follies per message.

Gentlemen, if you evaluate an artist in terms of number of publications in the press and value, then one of the Artists of Art - the notorious Damian Hirst.

Excuse me ignorant, but if I see the average poster - that and say that this poster, despite its price tag. Thumbnail number one can easily repeat a designer or illustrator. In this paper, number two - an interesting idea, but no more. This is clearly not the sculptor Rodin and Bernini, and not Konenkov. In this paper, number three, I did not find great color palette. Try to put it on the background of the same Yavlensky, what happens?
And there's nothing I look to the Internet - I doubt I'll find it at these artists work better.

As there was a fairy tale about a naked king? All adults admired, one foolish boy allowed himself to cry crown phrase.

PS
For some it's maybe stupid, but really - this is my personal opinion. And I am sure that the same opinion may be in other people. At the same Russian artists, not all of whom are followers of the computer printing and conceptualism. Or go to the Tretyakov Gallery, talk with visitors "pilot" of the hall, that they can tell you about the poorly dyed door and a box of garbage?

Vladimir V !....

Once in the directory "France the second half of XIX - XX century. Collection of paintings." tom2, 2002,
I stumbled on the page 291 on black and white photo artist's paintings Leon-Maxim Fevr (Faivre) "Russian Parisienne" 1891 .. Cite her image does not make sense.

     Description read:
"... The fact that the portrait was commissioned in the late 1880's the salon painter Fevru, shows a certain position in society and prosperity Russian model. Artist before that won a bronze medal at World Expo 1889 in Paris." At that time it was an expensive artist.
    In the same year in Arles hospital, Van Gogh painted a portrait of the doctor free Ray. Who has not been evaluated by Ray and sold for 150 francs Vollaru, which in ten years it preprodal Cassirer, he Dryue. In 1908, SI Shchukin bought it for 4600 francs. Cite its image, too, makes no sense. But a completely different reason - its all they know.
    Expensive custom painting Fevra never leave reservists GMII, unless it is sent to replenish the collection of the provincial museum.

PS

My example says it is wrong to treat the art as the stock market, focusing solely on price tags. If now promotions are growing rapidly, so soon they will fall sharply. Time will judge. Pena leaves. Buyers of "masterpieces" will record a loss.
However, the same can apply to most market shares. It may be advantageous to place the shares "of companies' second-or third-tier? Monsters of the world computer-Hewlett-Packard once started their work in the garage. Now this garage - a museum. But the neighborhood was founded Silicon Valley.

And more ... a picture of Van Gogh had plugged a hole in the henhouse. Later she was removed from there and now worth millions.

Your coalition should be ashamed of its members!

[color="# 666686"]Added a 34 seconds[/color]
Why we should be ashamed!
I did not call anyone stupid, nobody was rude. I spoke on the theme of trying to justify [argue] opinion, it is impossible to relate to art and artists as a commodity with a price tag hanging. Thus, even objected to one of the members of our group - Eugene. Or for him you too ashamed? He's the one that said here against? I do not even argue with Fross, I did not even know her views on the miniatures shown - admires Fross or disapproved.

I am sure that it is not necessary to call the artist's great, if it only the prices are great. This is show business, not art. Following the current vogue for conceptualism and relevance will be held, the current American crisis in the arts will be held, as was the same Fevr. The high price tags, perhaps, will be changed the sign "SALE!". I would hope for the best ...

However, if the owner of the subject say that he wants to see me here - I will not fight for space. I'll go and do not slam the door. I am not sorry to leave the computer "battlefield".
Goodbye.