Need advice of professionals
 

I know that similar themes occur regularly, but please appreciate my work. I would love to hear your opinion: Are they what or artistic interest? Are they interested in any gallery? Does it make sense to someone to show? Many thanks in advance.

Perhaps you have not yet chosen their particular style of painting. I would suggest to stay on the still life. Do you have it nice.
__________________________________________________
Manner (Italian maniera, French. Maniere, therein. Manier, Art und Weise) - the set of methods that characterize the stylistic and technical features of a direction or work of one artist.

First landscape good.

Landscapes are good, look for a buyer or a gallery.

Still life, in my opinion, uninteresting, as the work of Number 6.
And the scenery - quite professionally and with the soul painted.

I'd venture to say that I had sustained the assumption that the three different artists. Why cheat? Of course, every artist has a normal habit to change, once That way in 10 years. But not so. Or perhaps it had some experiments? Failed experiments.

Landscape in the manner of Georges Seurat not udachen.V other things feel a strong influence of painting Sezanna.I if it is advantageous to still life, the landscapes, on the contrary because very limited color palitra.Ili write more clearly, or change your style. As the letter from a professional, try to bring brightness.

Liked the last work "The path in the woods, still life, too. I am somewhat reminded of Odessa artist Olga Tokarev.

Vivian, yes, but the work of the Odessa artist Olga Tokarev, in turn, also reminiscent .... Slava said, who

And from the first (great!) Etude I would have done a tremendous canvas ..
(He looks great (in the thumbnails ..)
A size must be specified. (And lots of work)

Night (the moon) I also liked (but it is very "subjectively" also would have made a huge canvas)

Zakompanovany of traditional, but good. If you have education? School, any studio or college? What are the dimensions of work? It seems small, this can speak of some degree of uncertainty in the work and in themselves. Overall, not bad.

     This is really my work, written in the period from 2006 to 2009. Meaning deceive not see. As for experiments - especially those not dealt with, just starting work wanted to do it that way, and not otherwise. And after the rigid framework of study wanted to write like this you see and feel you, and not the teacher.