Peter Paul Rubens: wondering how to define?
 

Peter Paul Rubens, wondering how to define a copy of a painting by Rubens, it belongs to those created in the Antwerp school of reproduction prints, reproduced the original paintings by Rubens, or not?

And what has this to do Rubens?

Igor Guriev, Oh man you want this to be a Rubens!
Why challenge?
Let pampered!

Indeed, this is a copy of a painting by Rubens Hunting for wild boar 1618
but it does not belong "to the number created in the Antwerp school of reproduction prints, reproduced the original paintings by Rubens, that's for sure

If Nalbandian has written in his style of "Mona Lisa", it would be more similar to Leonardo than this "production" Rubens.

Lord What kind of horror?

Judging from such small images, it is not engraving at all.

This version of Rubens' paintings to be so mean? But why?

that Rubens did not hand I understand of course. but, I wonder who the author free copy! can anyone familiar with the works of Eugene Delakru, he said: Rubens ......!!
     Maybe it's him! but can anyone else who is well respected, creative views Rubens, that's interesting!
    A quality photo throw off no problem! the soap!

That he is different:)
Sergey Titarenko, it is very, very average, a copy of palest hue, as for me because, well, as much nothing interesting.

There is! something that I wanted to find out! Thank you! If interested see here, as this copy? http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...265#post457265