the very least, but the issue of comfort living environment is not long enough - you have to be completely insane to contrive, in today's highly competitive market professionals to find one that will make uncomfortable, ugly and not comfortable, but anything can happen to be honest.
So, you can, with absolute probability, assume that such customer will be offered only two organic options to solve their problems - "Modern" and "neoclassical" and this is a contradiction to frequent statements about the diversity of contemporary art and the existence of supposedly multiple vectors of its development.
Moreover, the probability that eventually the customer will receive "The neoclassical interior" - is negligible, because almost all the offers on the market today is based on service first, the simplest and most affordable option - "Contemporary".
How it will look like - some obvious way or another, it will be a kind of constructivism, minimalism and functionalism and no superimposed on these concepts, masking the true meaning and content of ideas, such as high-TEK, deconstruction, organi-tech, eco-tech, low -tech ... etc.., etc.. - Change nothing.
In the end the customer gets something quite recognizable and widespread, like this here
http://images.google.ru/images?gbv=2...= f & oq = in volume, this
http://images.google.ru/images?hl=ru...& tab = wi in the interior, and this
http://images.google.ru/images?gbv=2...= f & oq = in details (if he is lucky:) and will look externally, as "machine for living", but it will (again, if you're lucky) - actually quite convenient and comfortable accommodation.
The second option - "neoclassical" - is unlikely for several reasons.
1. First - this option is more expensive;
2. Secondly - professionals able to competently carry out such an option - unit;
3. Thirdly - this version is much more expensive and a good specialist will not find:)
However, the problem of positioning is not something irrelevant in the modern world, and today almost everyone faced the same problem at their level and everyone one way or another, it is necessary to make any expenditure, in order to "match" the images and stylistic trends of social layer to which the person considered himself a member.
From all this it necessarily follows that the modern elite positioning options than the "neoclassical" simply does not exist, and speed - with which the elites to this option will come - depends solely on two factors - the willingness of elites to spend on their positioning more financial resources and and quality of proposals (including specialists) in the market.
Then it's time to return to the concepts of "vanguard" and "new wave" and if you look at the issue at an angle of historicism, it turns out that the avant-garde and new wave is not modern terms, but something always existed and has always been associated with the concepts of "financial and intellectual elite, moreover, the most amusing that most often it was the neo-classical, although called by many names:)
However, apart from confusion in terminology and definitions, there are incidental obstacles hampering the possibility of "neoclassical" option - lack of information field and a layer of conducting such information.
While the situation in this sense is changing rapidly - at exhibitions, in magazines and online, is still extraordinarily difficult to find examples of modern "neoclassicism" in architecture, interior design and painting, so the gap that has always wanted to fill.
Recently, on this occasion, there was another dispute between the architects involved in interior, and promised to show them some interesting examples of modern "neo-classical in the interior of" what to do, without going into detailed analysis, comparison and description of methods, I think - more important to see once than hear a hundred times, and every man can understand without any commentary, that's what, especially among the pros.
More images and discussion
http://lufer-lj.livejournal.com/120581.html