Stillife
 

Keep an eye on this still life with a view to purchase.: Rolleyes:
x /m, 31 x 39 cm, unsigned, attributed to the early 17 th century, but not the essence.
Please express an opinion on color and the "quality" work.
Under the "quality" mean the executive level of the picture in comparison with the masters of still life 16-17 centuries.:)

sergejnowo, but whether it is possible to get a photo on mail?
Could be better?

uriart, flew
3,14 MB however: D

sergejnowo, and that there is a rectangle ocher in the lower right corner?

Cyril Syzransky, the old sticker auction, but completely faded

Soundly.

It was very similar in composition painting by Jan Brueghel the Velvet, was called "Bouquet." It was acquired by Boris Khanenko in an antique shop Felten in St. Petersburg. Then he transferred to the funds of the Historical Museum in Moscow. How successfully stolen.

subject, composition, specific letters of the author are personal and understandable.
As a scientist, an agronomist by profession, ask yourself one question. : rolleyes:
If there is already in 16-17 centuries large variety of roses, tulips, daffodils, peonies, etc., varietal diversity in the paintings to be seen. Feeling that each other is redrawn.
Could also be a fashion for 1-2 grades, say tulips, for 100 -150 years.
Yes, and different people /buyers must have different tastes.: Rolleyes:

More recently, an identical case, painting "Bouquet of Flowers in a Vase" 26 x 18,1., Dutchman Ambrosiusa Bosschaerta (1573 - 1621), was sold at auction for the West 3 750 000 EUR.

: eek:
you will tell you what there people so hooked?