Watercolor on evaluation. Shalyapin and others.
 

Some old watercolors.
What would be the point?

Like P. Buchkin?

mileva, no habits to make a conclusion on the photo, but if your question is: "does it?"the answer is: no, it's not like the wings of a bad repaint Izv. portrait 1918, source second portrait't remember - but I wonder if he has Buchkin. And all three-not him. In short: he's much better than risoul the late 10s-early 20s, as he is already in Stieglitz drew bouchee than the author you presents masterpieces.

mileva, Yes, and the scenery is very difficult to correlate with m. years 60 to throw to the date - it would be more reliable

Like something very strange, drawings saw alive, there is no feeling of modernity and the source is very reliable.

mileva, Yes, it happens more often than we would like : from the wall, from his grandfather, from the descendants. That does not negate the above. Alas. Plus (not main) signature bad, authenticity is uncertain. But it's all-ExC. from the photo, but there is doubt carry on face-to-face examination, as inace

And this job?

Is questionable?