K. Korovin?
 

I would be grateful to hear the views concerning the authorship of the
Thanks

Doctor of physics and mathematics expertise doing... Funny.
Korovin say... Yeah-Ah-SSS...

and who do you think should make the laser spectral microanalysis?In conclusion, no one argues that it K. Korovin,so I turned to the forum

not Korovin

No, well of course you can and "chemistry" to bear at first, not showing the expert - critic.

Logical.
And even more logical - making one step to make a second one.
ujujk, since I spent the technological expertise, and make another art. And you'll know for sure.

And where there is about Korovin say ? Do you write or have I missed something?

[QUOTE="Борис Кон;3412731"]No, well of course you can and "chemistry" to bear at first, not showing expert iskusstve@
Logically of course in the beginning to show the critic .Still best to consult with several...... And so it turns out pushing it to the desired.

In K. Korovin?
Maybe there are serious arguments to reckon the landscape to the creative heritage of K. Korovin.....
Or inspired laser spectral microanalysis:)

If the artist is present ochre - it doesn't mean she 40,000 years. This examination does not allow to assert that it is the work of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and therefore useless. According to the technique of writing makes it possible to doubt that this is K. Korovin.

Thanks to all responded.How much could this work?

Thanks to all responded.How much could this work?