![]() |
"It's antique" finishes? Heavy laced story ...
Unpleasant, heavy laced story of Antiquaries Preobrazhensky, false Kiselev, deceived customers, kidalove real estate in the area Prechistenka ends - August 6, the verdict will be. Kucha publications looked on this topic, but clearly is not. One time was even rumored that the case began to turn when one of the fake "Kiselev" got almost a collection of almost Putin ... What is certainly nonsense, but nafantazirovat possible. Then there were the "denial" that Putin's more interested in the book:) But certainly in the whole history is a very simple explanation. What actually happened? Who understands? What opinion?
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=915354 Antiques asked not to disclose the verdict //The owners of the gallery "Russian Collection" said the last word The newspaper Kommersant »№ 128 (3945) of 24.07.2008 State prosecution has asked for the mistress of the Transfiguration (pictured) 11 years in prison, for the lord of the Transfiguration - 10 years
Читать дальше...
Vladislav Trifonov b - |
never heard of this case, but was surprised to read. I believe in something then another thing. There is no way, with the expert opinion of the Grabar Center, you can not blame people. And how to prove that they knew that selling fake work? I do not understand about the picture Makovsky? she really tried to steal from somewhere? reason is definitely something else. If now they were really sent to prison, it will be a precedent and then followed by other similar processes? after "unconscious" of market participants who sell fake stuff, not really so little. Or must for this plant experts, which is also wrong. This is just an opinion. Putting sure if you can only succeed in proving that a false assessment was made intentionally? Then it falls under the heading of fraud. Voobshchem, let's see what all will end.
|
It was loud, that's written about him ....
Meister, everything was cool confused. Here, if you're interested in the sources (links). About misguided not very expert, I believe. In 2005 in Moscow were the Internet and could use it to watch the outcome of auctions. A single exposure that followed him was running a massive revision. Why was not done - is anyone's guess.
http://www.informacia.ru/2005/news2140.htm http://www.vremya.ru/2005/230/51/141001.html http://www.polit.ru/culture/2006/02/02/antique.html http://www.rg.ru/2005/11/02/antikvar.html |
Meister,
so the point is that the prosecution is trying to prove that the Transfiguration was originally knew that it falshaki, bought at auctions of western Germans, the Danes (anyone there yet), inspired perelitsovku and then reaffirmed in the Grabar zavedovo these fake paintings. .. That is, it is important here is deliberate. Experts generally not involved, I think, in this criminal trial))) here in detail tells the story from the beginning: http://text.uuu.ru/antik/news/2005/11/28/ and then chronicle the events of expert on this background: http://dradams.livejournal.com/61764.html and sample images, I think, still nowhere to be hanged: http://koukhto.livejournal.com/544552.html |
Vladimir, there are more questions than answers ..
|
Цитата:
|
well as experts not involved? Here artkonsalting able to identify this "specious" made counterfeiting, and experts Grabar not? life will not believe. though more questions than answers.
|
but nowhere do they not been dismissed, not only in this case.
|
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
|
Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 13:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.