Aivazovsky, 1846
 

Hello!

I would like to hear the opinions of respected members of the forum about the authorship of this work.



Ivan AIVAZOVSKY

(1817-1900).

"Vue de Nice au clair de lune (quai de Rauba Capeu)".

Huile sur toile, signée en cyrillique en bas à droite et datée 1846.

Contresignée au dos.

H: 36 cm - L: 54 cm


Expositions:

Sainte-Maxime, 2009, Cabriès, 2012

Présence russe, Nice et la Côte d'Azur, exposition du 16 décembre 2012 au 18 mars 2013, Musée Masséna, Nice

Bibliographie:

Alex Benvenuto, Peintres paysagistes de la Côte d'Azur, Nice, 2009

Alex Benvenuto, Un peintre russe sur la Riviera, Ivan Aïvavosky, Lou Sargentin,

n ° 192, Nice, juin 2010

Provenance: Vente damien Leclere, Marseille, 1er novembre 2008

Strongly doubt the authorship of IA.

But argumenov not.
 
<! - ~ 12 ~ ->

Sea and rocks painted well, the sky, especially in the center - worse.
May account?
Or this photo?
Impression as if it is a very well-known story, straight textbook .... We must wait for the most important of forum special on Aivazovsky.

http://hohland.com.ua/map1024971_0_0.htm


It seems the plot: the sea, the night, the moon and the ship ...

But as they say, feel the difference.


IA
so loved the ships that would not only hint at its presence.

IMHO


A light fire me at all finishes ...

More than questionable thing.


Particularly alarmed "little green men".

Added after 2 minutes
Is always Aivazovsky painted ships in the foreground ? He could do without them . That this coal fire so terrible spotted there and can not see any of that. <! - ~ 1 ~ - > About authorship, a word was said .
Night with the moon , beach, sea with a ship , you can assemble in different ways, we are talking about this song, what's wrong?

Men do not. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

No. But try to find his ship at such a distance , and that's so sketchy .
In the coal fire scary is that apart from him nothing and will not make out . That is - for light spark . Flame , as they say, " impotent with flat ." And do not take the Red Army , and in general ...

Maybe everything separately and acceptable .... Even non-round moon . But all together ...

Wrote about the sky and the moon in the sky, too, just in the center.

Why something about the signature no one asked, it is there or not?

Good time.

I think the style of painting much later than 1846. Your opinion on this subject?.
And it is in the manner of the artist, possibly original.
Anyway, from the accounts would not immediately sbrasyval.S SW.

Solovlad, 'So , when I looked for the first time on the job, the time would attribute it to the 80s , but not 40 - Vym .
The case is still in the fact that the site where I took a photo , no photo electronically.
The catalog itself is in PDF format and I made a screenshot .
Concerning the signature. So the comments indicate that the work is signed , Cyrillic , by hand , right and dated.
signée en cyrillique en bas à droite et datée 1846
Something like this , here .