Jean Cocteau - the original or a copy?
 

Actually in our house for a long time have a picture signed by Jean Cocteau in his manner , but the original or not, none of the family does not know .. Bought 10 years ago in Geneva, one collector, he claimed that the script . Signature pattern behind it seems to me clearly just a signature collector and not the author .. But I'm not an expert , if you can see plz can someone be able to help estimate .. Thanks in advance !

I attach the photo , and here's another link in high resolution :

http://flic.kr/p/kuj14L
http://flic.kr/p/kuhjde
http://flic.kr/p/kugJUH
http://flic.kr/p/kugGEx
http://flic.kr/p/kuhfwX

I think neither one nor the other . Third , that you little upset .

Most likely , someone tried to simulate risunochek by Jean Cocteau , using as a basis for his bronze sculpture "Le Petit Faune" in 1958 . And it should be noted , the experiment failed .
Also talking about it and the signature itself , not unlike any handwriting or by construction (I mean this in the name spelling without surname).

Below - miniatures, where there was a fantasy, but takzheprimer reference signatures.

Thanks for the answer . Signature seems to me just a very accurate handwriting and construction. Very often Cocteau signed only by the name and the "star" ( I brought pictures of his work ) , and if you look at the handwriting and the title is "J" and descending "n" look very similar .. I thought that it might not be a copy , and wannabe but what's the point then copy the exact signature Cocteau ? It seemed to me that the imitators usually make ambiguous signature , a similar but not exact , that they are not prizhuchit signature .. And it seems to me very accurately transmitted.

I also drew attention to this "Little Fawn " , but at the same time I found a listing dozens if not hundreds of different sketches in a series of "Faun " is so different that this work could well be one of this series . Just proguglit Pictures "Jean Cocteau Faun" - many variations ..

There is likely to question the stylistic analysis and the technique of drawing .. Actually I certainly understand that the photo is almost impossible to determine the authenticity of the picture, but rather the idea here is that if there is a possibility that this is the original , you can spend 300 euros for examination ( Cocteau in the center of Paris, I then 3 hours from Geneva ) , or if the experts can be seen with the naked eye , that is not the original , it makes no sense to pay for expertise in this issue .. )