| Черномашенцев Владимир |
27.07.2009 13:16 |
If you do not see the difference, why pay more?
Giperrrealizm looks quite impressive, especially for the novice art lovers. Indeed, one can say what a great artist - painted as a picture! That's just why take the bread out of good professional photographers? I think that a good photographer will make this a better shot than the average, but masterovity painter. So love to draw painters who are not able to invent and create a real picture.
With the release of huge masses of Chinese and Thai artists (call them artists - hand does not rise), you can buy with quality repaint the "Photos" for ridiculous prices (100-200-300 dollars). While in Thailand, I "dug up" two paintings in this style. I drew a great master copyist. The work was saved by the fact that it was redrawn from photographs of professional photographers from the magazine "Neshenl Geografiks. A European put an interesting shot, but plodding taets (s Chinese) to repeat it. It turned out bad, but can this be considered art? In any case, they differed from the production of Thai art salons, however, and cost is relatively expensive. Perhaps the "ninth wave" products MadeInChina must put an end to this temporary destination in the art. Especially with the development of modern computer and printing equipment, which was not in the 70 -, 20 century. It is no longer necessary and paint - made the frame on a digital camera, finalized in "Photoshop", he drove the image on the large-format plotter (printer) on the canvas - what more overpay ?!...
I know one of our (Soviet, Armenian or Russia), the artist, who this style have had measles in 70 years, by analogy with the Americans - Khachatryan, Carlos. He still uses a part of this style, but only as a support tool. A right to use the photo - not interesting.
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=35925 |
