Gerard Dou?
 

Good day!
 Help identify authorship ?
I hope that this is one of the earliest paintings of Gerard Dou (Gerard Dou),
Written by him ( on the conclusion by some experts ) when he was a pupil of Rembrandt Doe , either immediately after the Departure of Rembrandt in Amsterdam in 1631-1632

Painting is not a member of Interpol in searching catalogs (although Germany was taken from 1945)
We in turn have already held several examinations confirming authenticity of the painting , including the Hermitage and the famous expert Vyazemsk

In the picture there are drawbacks .
Hands reduced.
Browridges and eyebrows are not expressed - the skull close to the female .
Midline forehead - nose - chin seems bent .
Hands on the book of the forearm is not well developed in relation to the face.
Painting a few dryish , although archaic within those traditions.
Sloppy finishing clothing , which is important for assessing the social situation at the time, and sloppy finishing background .
It is inherent in the technique of the young artist - I do not know , but a mature artist did not show such defects and carefully distinguished .

 I do not know how much you paid for their expertise , but my expertise is cheaper and more . Work very good and you need to spend a qualified expert , you do not want to sell it for nothing , though , after examination, the work can be quite cheap.

dou
 

In fact of the matter that strikes negligence in detail while the Dow within paintings can be viewed with a magnifying glass .

Perhaps this picture 15 - 17 year old boys ( pupil of Rembrandt ) and possibly a mature Doe (at the time when he had his own school ) and brush the Dow here belongs to the head and hands , and the rest dorisoval same student how he himself was when the Dow


Yet for seeding add another item, the signature master whether it can mutate so ?

We have forensic criterion - stability signature.
To conclude the authenticity researched dozens of samples.

Perhaps there is a problem , for example , Pushkin :

" The museum does not give individuals and organizations the written statements and certificates of authenticity to the work. "
http://www.arts-museum.ru/museum/service/

As I understand it - the trend , but ...

In fact of the matter is that in both examinations and no one raised the issue prove the authorship of the Dow , and raised the question - What is it all about (for me for example painting on oak in general was unusual even with such careless asymmetrically beveled on the back side)

here's another examination which was signed Vyazemskaya

Daylight icons? ? ? nameless copy ? ? ?

Unfortunately, my antivirus program does not handle your investment .

http://postimg.org/gallery/79psk2y2/

Paulig, apparently, you dug a subject very well, deep and wide and it is not spent a penny.

As they say, the end justifies the means.
Tell me please, what is your goal?