N.E.Sverchkov, Yamskaya triple
 

Dear experts, and everyone is welcome!

Interested in all opinions on the film.
Thanks in advance.

Oil on canvas
67h54 see caption "N.Sverchkov 1862"

Crickets Zhukovsky /06.03.1817-25.06.1898


well I think masterovito be seen packed with commercial plots hand


preservation of admiration, seen - stored properly and it pleases


or does not match the age /author

redbor, and who was taking photos?

Good all the time.

I think that is not H. Crickets.
From SW.

clabo too for Sverchkova on such pics there can be no discussion

Ya better not happen, sorry.
And if, Crickets, what could be the price?

Recommend first requests for price enlist in any way a heavy paper of authenticity.
In any case it will be useful.
But if you prefer a free advice, it is not crickets.

1. Picture clearly written later " claimed " 1862 Judging by the nature scenic modeling, not earlier 1880s . , In my opinion

2 . Painting Sverchkova thinner sophistication. In his paintings , as a rule, there is something like a faint haze , kinda tumantsa , clouds pattern on the edges.
 Especially , the same , but frosty haze present, probably in all his works to the winter theme. Here we do not see .

3 . Signature too " roundish " and rather lurid - insecure .

4 . You should check whether the copy of this work con . 19 - beginning of the 20th century. some of the paintings Sverchkova

5 . My opinion : not Crickets Zhukovsky ( 1817-1898 ) . However , as a quite good work n /x kon.19 - beg. 20th century thing can have antique value .

And what should be the price of the work N.Sverchkova the presence of such a paper?

Maybe Crickets-written work, even very good, but the question is too bright colors that Sverchkov not inherent and sprawling signature that too?, And therefore it is necessary to do the examination, as the price n /x and Sverchkova simply not comparable.