Carl Rosen, landscape
 

Carl Rosen, landscape

The opinion of respected members of the forum!

Size: 28 x 42.5 cm

The manner of this kind seems lax.
But the signature is in doubt.

Signature affixed, but perhaps the author.

It does not seem ...
He signed the work is very loose in the process, as it were twisting the brush is very characteristic manner.
And here is dry and uncertain.
And then signed with Rosen is always in the lower right-hand corner.
  

It seems to me with the caption something wrong.

When the painting is signed by the author (usually on request) long after it was written, different things happen, including insecurity, etc.

Tomorrow morning will go to the expert committee on oral advice and possibly order a full examination.
The work brought two days before the start of trading, so maybe fyuchernaya ekpertiza will be included in the price (the only way out of the situation)

It's the right thing!

Signature I do not like it, and it is clearly dry deposited.

Dima28, we discuss a signature? Or a job? Then that forensic department?

As planned, today was a commission of experts to be consulted .
At first glance, the work did not like. Then, a careful study came to the conclusion that the most original signature , not printed on top ( looking through a microscope and ultraviolet ) , the work can be of late ( 1930th ) , and from that technique is different from earlier works. Canvas and stretcher old (just 30th years ) . Confused excellent preservation , but it is due to the fact that the work is varnished .

As a result, decided to locate in the auction catalog with a reservation ( provedenenie with the conclusion of the examination is included in the lot) .