Kazimir Malevich?
 

Dear experts, Hello.

I would like to hear your opinion on the account of this work.

The authenticity of the estimator.

Best regards.

Your writing has the same chance to be a pattern of Malevich, the word "Art" on the stamp is grammatically correct.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Philippe, I admit ignorance of officials in 1920, but what promyatiny sheet in a frame?

What these promyatiny as it confirms the authenticity of the work?

No!
This is nothing more than a question.

There is exposed to water or very thin paper and glue that's warped.
Paper Pts.
of poor quality.
Interestingly, ink drawing die and the same?
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> I doubt that in '20 By making the stamp, the master did not know how to spell the word "arts".

Why do you doubt , if in 2013 you wrote : "I wonder [COLOR=Red"],[/COLOR] in the illustration ink and stamp are the [COLOR=red"]the same[/COLOR]? doubt that in '20 , By making the stamp , master did not know , how to spell the word " Art "?

Konechno.Kayus ashamed.
Well, I did stamp on the works of Malevich is not set.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

I've always considered myself the zanudlivym on ...
Magnolia, I was wrong ! You steeper ! <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

this is a clear fufel, I met other stamps Division Narcompros.
Everything was without fault.
I think the stamps in the 1920s were different.
The water spilled on purpose, and that is a coffee spill.