Zverev it?
 

Dear friends!


Do you think, at first glance, without recourse to an expert like a "Portrait of a Woman" by the master's hand?
Photo - seller, others I have not.


KM
70h50sm, 1972

I think that falshak . Arguments in the early seventies, he signed very differently , such a signature is more typical of the end of the seventies - early eighties , and the manner in which the work is performed , more in line with the end of the seventies , not the beginning. In addition, the animal is very rarely painted nudity - he is ashamed of her . And that 's so pririsovat lady , um , chest ? Sitters had greatly hurt the artist. Well, a large number of small parts embarrassing. In general , the work is highly questionable . Without Silaeva not take it.

Purely intuitive, more likely than not.

Seller of this figure , whose name IvanM did not want to share - goreizvestny American auction Trinity International Art, is segodneshny on day one of the deep muddy holes that are constantly shut up Delco - forgers items art. In short , the seller - it's a dump fakes. I wonder how this auction yet exist.
See the original painting there - an extreme rarity . Therefore, the plot, and signature plus auction platform -hole - speak for themselves .

IvanM, do not mess with this gang .

http://tiauctions-com.cftvgy.org/con...sian-1931-1986

IvanM,

I would like is not kupil.ne

Here is a similar portrait.

antik2010,

Well, just like <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

So light shows like the real thing.
<! - ~ ~ 6 ->

antik2010,

What I'm govoryu.sravnite sami.chem do they look like?
"Spout pugovkoy.gubki bow" <! - ~ 3 ~ ->