2 theatrical sketch
 

Help in the attribution 2x theatrical sketches unknown author, perhaps forum users will be able to identify who it is ..

Originate from the archive Dobuzhinskiy son , and were in the same folder with 2 other sketches Serge Ivanov.

The signature on the two are reading as J Glusky? tried to search for information , but unfortunately, did not advance .

That you have purchased at a recent auction in Tours?

Glasha, yes that's right!
and that it is something influences?

In general , it affects the provenance (positively ) your sketches .

Just wanted to say it was a good (!) On this auction , and especially - from the archives of Rostislav Dobuzhinskiy .
I then excitedly attributed the Russian pair of sketches from the early 20th (the French are sometimes very interesting to sell )), but to me they have not got - a few days of sadness .... <! - ~ 1 ~ -> .
Tried to buy on the internet, in Tours, did not go , so " these two " did not see - in the catalog were not, in the lot just a photo of two sketches of Serge Ivanov ( well, I liked ) , but " these two " interesting - it makes sense understand.

The authorship personally, I do not say anything . There was a Russian artist and set designer abroad - Glinski , but his name was Nicholas. On these kind of different initial. By the way, clearly visible - make a better picture captions , maybe this will advance the search.

The author
themes [/URL] also in the sale were a few papers by Glinski.

I also liked.


igorr,

It makes sense to wait until the forum will go Sim.
Or contact her at l /n

There, in my opinion, not initial, but just a tick in front of the word.

And read (or rather not chitaetssya) as a set of bukaf: Gludxy.

Maybe it's all the character's name, not the artist's signature ...

Sim Now , as far as I know , too busy Pts . important works . But I guess it makes sense to wait.

In any case , we need clear pictures sign /label to make sure that there is (Glusky _ Gludxy _ Glinsky).


Interestingly , thank you. And what about N.Glinskom is, and images of his work there , are rare (or rather , I did not come across ) .)
(and how kruzhavchiki- then spelled out on the skirt to the one with the rake .. < ! - ~ 1 ~ -> )

Yes, there was a lot of fun. And maybe you were upset because Annenkov ? <! - ~ 1 ~ - > though I did not like the idea of ​​selling them all one by one. as a result of a single archive was carried off in pieces , and some items were not PRODANOV .. nemnozhno strange approach .


I, too, there is something determined attributed the ! there were a few interesting things. e.g. one character .

As for Ivanov , the sketches in hand was better than the picture . The only problem provenance . We , you and I know that he is " out " , but no
evidence of this in the hands of none. there are just 2 work. as a result can only refer to a specific sale at the auction, but no more.
Now here's another thought , there is both a sketch on a dark gray paper .. whether they should try to restore something , to give a fresh new look , or so it is better to leave ..

Concerning Glinski .. Thanks for the tip ! looked , at this time he was living in Sofia .. and special footnotes to his familiarity with Dobuzhinsky I have found. alternative course
possible , who knows ..

Seyschas 'll post another photo captions

Добавлено через 7 минут
came out here like pochetche

came out here like pochetche