A pretty picture
 

63h93

Help to read the caption.
And what about the period can be.

Thank you <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

On linen canvas is not like, then - had to turn black.
If not darkened - hence the recent canvas.

Dubbed the picture, apparently

I do not think ...
Modern painting based on the painting of the 19th century.

Maybe print with applied "relief"?


Something seems to me, so now can hardly simple workaholic artist from China.

 Long studied the second photo , but was not able to understand that this - the brush strokes or modifications to gel?

(Upper left corner of the photo says, especially for printing).

According to the " coloring " , however, is very similar to the print . What a turnaround in this case it does not.

Yes, I also think that the canvas - not duplicating . In any case, the nature of the weave density and grain size , clearly visible in the photo section ( upper left corner) does not intrude upon the canvas in the photo turns. ( Heartfelt greetings boxers - extramural <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ -> )
Respectively, and the painting itself - not daveshny , and quite a noneshnego .

Yes, a picture of the teeth are not slomash.

Canvas (turnover) only if the factory - not a speck!


Suspicious ...
More inclined to print.
And the flowers themselves, once again, some printing.
And what exactly is the modern letter - do not believe it.

In short, this is a case when the frame is much more expensive than the picture itself ... <! - ~ ~ 6 ->