Miro Painting?
 

is this work.
it is what or value? again or the trash?
If anyone is interested you can meet

One of two things: either it's really original Miro (if you are fabulously wealthy), or fake.
Personally, I distinguish one from the other can not ...

kamenskiy1967, there is again signature!

You'll then write to: picture of the artist is not known to me

Toinen, but the signature is.
but whose job it can be?

How?
You have all thrown out?
So cried my $ 300?
<! - ~ 2 ~ ->

When an honest artist makes a copy of the fair , he puts his signature on it . If the artist puts on a copy of someone else's signature , such a copy is called a fake, and the name of the man who performed the already exactly no meaning and no one is interested.

IV, do not understand your humor

Added after 2 minutes
Marassa, why did you decide that this is a fake?

What kind of humor ? You yourself have suggested in this thread : http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...199971&page=2:

take flowers " Gorbatovskaya ." I wanted out of kindness to help you save money, said give "so" anyone.

" So ," as you can see, no one takes . So I wanted to take them from you for $ 300 ( not enough, of course , but oh well ) , money, of course , go ahead ...

And you all have taken and thrown out ! .. (((( (

This picture, by the way, is willing to take a $ 200 - it 's more like it , though bright and looks like Miro . So hey ​​throw .

If you decide - in a personal email , tell us where to send your money.

Marassa, that you just had to deal with this artist?
For your information, I showed this work at the Tretyakov they said that it is likely the original attribution but they will not do so as not properly authorized. engaged in this advisory council which is located in Paris

And where I thought it was fake?
I f you from the very beginning has written that one of two things: either the original or fake.

Added after 8 minutes
PS And to ask "who is the author" is meaningless in this situation: either Miro, or it does not matter who.