Porcelain. Mark "Fish"?
 

Good day!


Two pair of vases.
Height - 33 cm

Porcelain, polychrome overglaze painting, gilding.


There are signs in the test and also the stigma of cobalt in the form of fish.


Perhaps someone had met with a similar name?


Please help in the attribution and evaluation!


Thanks in advance <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Better late than never <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
I have two options :
1. Keppelsdorf , Germany, late 19th- beginning of the 20th century.
2 . Nyon , Switzerland 2 pol.18 in .
In such cases, would be nice to know the provenance of things. But we can say that hand -painted , good safety , vases are collector's interest , but not museum quality .

And both, in my opinion, are not suitable: presented in the form of branded fish completely drawn in cobalt, and those on the scans - only the outline.

Cyril , I was very interested and I opened Directory " Stamps majolica , faience and porcelain ," avt.S.I.Dudenko 2000 Ed. "Maidan" , Kharkiv 838 pages. Besides, I have a computer yet ok.1000 stamps . Of all these the most fit the submitted photos. And the letter G in the test still pushes me on the assumption that this is Germany . In any case - a Western Europe .
There are more options on the photo

And why not?
In German, for example, Germany with the letter D, actually.

Yes, I agree, I really Gardner letter G was used, but the fish is not observed ...
And the German company also Gott, but the letter was gold.

Stamp on the photo and figurines period 1926-62 yy
As can be seen, Germany starts to G.

Well, sometimes put on exports and Germany.

But in general, the attribution of china, it is necessary with the letter G to be careful.
In the stamps used its plants in many European countries, including
and Russia, as mentioned above.

It sounds like you have a beautiful pair of porcelain vases! The cobalt fish mark is quite distinctive and could be a clue to their origin. Many porcelain manufacturers used similar motifs, so it might be worth researching brands known for their polychrome overglaze painting and gilding. If anyone has encountered this specific mark or has insights on attribution and evaluation, your input would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!