A.Buh in the MMSI
 

Yesterday , an exhibition for the 90th anniversary of Aaron Buch
The exhibition is big, solid , about 70 - 80 oil paintings and graphics. A high level of work and in this sense to visit the exhibition to navigate the future in understanding the terms of reference of painting Buch very useful. Most of those present have discovered graphics, and I am among them . But first things first .
It's a lot of people , the exhibition is located on two floors and three locations shown three films about the making of paintings Buhom . As many people know , but let me remind others , Aaron did not use brushes, drawing (or rather created ) hands. Therefore, the process of creating a very fruity and entertaining, especially when close to the screen is finished picture - great. The exhibition catalog was published , thanks to the organizers Sergey Alexandrov and Elena Yakovleva.

Добавлено через 8 минут
The exhibition is very positive - works undoubtedly have a very positive energy and share it generously . This picture is interesting and this process consists of two parts : the first when you stand close to the picture - you absorb the emotions , for the second part you need to move ten steps and watch the chaos emerges paint a landscape or figure - great.

The exhibition is very positive - works undoubtedly have a very positive energy and share it generously . This picture is interesting and this process consists of two parts : the first when you stand close to the picture - you absorb the emotions , for the second part you need to move ten steps and watch the chaos emerges paint a landscape or figure - great.

Graphics

There is no chaos spots - the exact opposite laconic lines, possibly misleading after a riot in the technique of oil.

Yes , I look at this picture (and at this) and imagine how the house would look picture Aron Bukh - nothing close to hang and do not.

In the CHA is also a large exhibition Buch is (was), but there is more commercial work.

Funny, but with all the mixing paints on canvas paintings are not abstractions.
This is a very specific still lifes and landscapes.

Добавлено через 8 минут
This does not mean that everyone who came to the exhibition related to the work of Buch equally positive . There were those who thought and believed his work pop. And turning to me shrugged say what 's wrong with that - all the same. Mol recently led to it customers , paintings were worth a penny, could score as many as you carry away , but who then thought ... Well, it's the usual story , of course , and now there are artists who are now no one sees at close range , but it will take time and again : - Well, who knew ...

This does not mean that everyone who came to the exhibition related to the work of Buch equally positive . There were those who thought and believed his work pop. And turning to me shrugged say what 's wrong with that - all the same. Mol recently led to it customers , paintings were worth a penny, could score as many as you carry away , but who then thought ... Well, it's the usual story , of course , and now there are artists who are now no one sees at close range , but it will take time and again : - Well, who knew ...

"If I knew musts" ... <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

However, I do not share the opinion that the pictures look the same and Buch here no matter what. And it 's all here again and by Miro and Kandinsky from ( yes there - mapping the whole of the Paris School ) . Well, who is not from them ? On the other hand confuse it with someone else - it is impossible . And if so , what is it secondary ?
I wonder how he came to this style ? Before perestroika was quite a Soviet artist , very poor and not recognized officialdom . But after a zzheg not recognize all the pictures and began to make a completely different , good commercial gallery and there it was quite a new style of selling . But those early works that's almost no little from what it was .