Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Popov? Please see (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=194992)

Sergey11 22.03.2013 19:36

Popov? Please see
 
Вложений: 2
That it can be.

It is unlikely to priests?

Another byaka?
:D>
 
:shy:>

Toinen 22.03.2013 19:39

Цитата:

Сообщение от Sergey11 (Сообщение 2517611)
Another byaka




What you said.

Sergey11 22.03.2013 19:43

Here here - another "Masterpiece" :)>

Игорь Гурьев 24.03.2013 06:10

Цитата:

Сообщение от Toinen (Сообщение 2517631)

What you said.


Yeah ...

_____

Jane Doe 24.03.2013 06:33

Вложений: 2
Цитата:

Сообщение от Sergey11 (Сообщение 2517611)
What could it be.


It can not be, and is Another parody on the vanguard Popova.

Or as commonly called a compilation.


The original is in the Museum of Modern Art in New York (MoMA).


Painterly Architectonic (pictorial architectonics)


Oil on canvas, 1917 Dimensions -31 1/2 x 38 5/8 "(80 x 98 cm).

Игорь Гурьев 24.03.2013 06:52

Цитата:

Сообщение от Jane Doe (Сообщение 2520851)
The original is in the Museum of Modern Art in New York (MoMA).

Great.

Once you have uploaded two of the original.

And then a third.


And, I think, all around ravnokachestvennye.


Triangle draw - many do not mind.

Sergey11 24.03.2013 10:28

I'm confused where the original :D>

triangles and squares

Кирилл Сызранский 24.03.2013 13:44

Цитата:

Сообщение от Sergey11 (Сообщение 2521011)
I'm confused where the original :D>

triangles and squares

here Your first thing, and the second - from MOMA.

Jane Doe 24.03.2013 17:26

Цитата:

Сообщение от Sergey11; 2521011"
I'm confused where the original

This was clear from the start topics. Original at MOMA.
Цитата:

Сообщение от Igor Guryev, 2520861"
Only you have posted two of the original.

God forbid! I have posted only one original.

Pay attention to the details of the receipt priklennnoy overleaf. All on the exact data, deliberately written illegibly.
Date 1 III 196 -?
Store number - either 19, or other
Number of the receipt no.
Product price is illegible.
Words the price of goods is not (as is required on the check.)
Illegible signature of the seller. (A more logical to sign inspector).
Something there namazyukano red pen.
Instead of the number of the receipt something like "Zeno". Exactly the same "Zenon" issued on canvas on the purchase invoice.
Green ballpoint pen spelled like "composition" yes wiped almost beyond recognition.

Sales receipt issued to gross violations of the filling of such documents. Was this some kind of sense for inspector-seller? - No.
Sticker artificially grow old with broad brush strokes with glue or something else.
After seeing only the back of this object, you can not look at the front to put an accurate diagnosis.

Владимир Владимирович 24.03.2013 18:27

Цитата:

Сообщение от Jane Doe (Сообщение 2521451)
Date 1 III 196 -??

Pens in the USSR began to produce in 1965, and the massive use in 1970.
On the check labels in different colors!
There, in 1961 or 1964 in my opinion.
Somehow very doubtful!
:D>


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 23:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot