Who has more rights - the author or curator?
 

Fotografer.ru to read an article about stewardship in the photos, the problems in the selection of works in the exhibition.

Surely with such problems experienced gallerists and curators in the formation of exhibitions of artists. So who has more rights?

Here is the famous photo:

Once a famous photo, maybe it was a joint advertising creative artist and curator?
:)>

This artist does not need this kind of advertising.

But still . It is clear that the curator of the exhibition forms , selects the work according to his undertaking. And if the author ( photographer /artist ) does not like it, and there are disputes , up to the removal of exposure. I wonder whose side the law ( in the case of , say , financial losses )? For me, it's just idle interest .

Tamila, you have the example of a large exhibition and collaboration , where the removal of one thing , or even as a result of conflicts of all the works of a single author koordinalno neither the concept nor the soma does not affect exposure .
And if it goes on, for example , personal , there can only advise the curator of the author or heirs, but it does not dictate.

Here the question is not who's in the law, and who is more authoritative and more important for the exhibition.

The civil law is emphasizing the concept of "contract".
All is not taken into account the agreement is governed by the settlement or judgment.