Cubism.
 

Good evening!

Like to hear your opinion on this work.

Is it possible to identify the author?

Work from Europe.

Photographed through glass, in reality, the colors are rich, deep and rich.
Size 35 x 26 cm

Someone turn the pages of the novel by Jules Verne stuck.
:)>

All true.
Work is done on a piece of paper that is glued onto thick cardboard . As for me, salon workers in Marseille tried to pull a sheet by removing the lower studs on the subframe. But seeing that the sheet with the work glued to cardboard and paperboard , in turn, is glued to the sub-frame and magazine newspaper version «The Survivors of the Chancellor: Diary of J. R. Kazallon, Passenger »( novel" Chancellor . J.-C. Kazallona passenger Diary ") and does not go out freely from a glassed frame , then abandoned further research. Rama - " Karelian birch ."
Salon really expensive, " consumer goods " is practically no items cheaper thousand euros are virtually absent.

Yes?
And for how much it was purchased this product?

evident that the inscription stylized something Russian.
Perhaps letters redraw foreigner who does not understand the nuances of form letters in Cyrillic.
The question is, why?

It is out of the 'expensive gifts. "
Price worthy.

In order to issue a Russian thing.

Hence, by the way, "frame -" Karelian birch »" .

Cyril, I do not quite understand you.
What exactly do you mean?

I'd love to hear your opinion about the work.

It is not work of Russian avant-garde artist .
OK , let's say that the author - a Russian cubist .
And in Russia, took the form of cubism kubofuturizma .
And even with all the futuristic and daring Russian revolutionaries in the arts, it's hard to imagine that any of them in the early twentieth century was able to invent a mini -skirt. :)>

Earlier, someone had tried to read the inscription on the cardboard and tearing "of the newspaper magazine."

Добавлено через 24 минуты
What an unexpected turn. That is, you assume the picture depicts a woman in a mini- skirt? I saw a man in traditional dress French nobleman :)>. That is, you start from the assumption that the work of "outstanding " for the works of the Russian avant-garde artists of the early 20th century. I have no such expectations , I was looking for information about the possible authorship. I understand your opinion of what the picture is not, what do you think it is ? I am convinced that the work " is not of yesterday ," and not designed for today's market conditions.