Porcelain Vase
 

Height 58 cm Stamp not found.
Help determine whose work and cost estimate.

Such rootless ( in the sense - no stamps ) vases French or Belgian last third of the 19th century, are usually described in auktsionnikah collective "Old-Brussels" or "Old-Paris".
At this origin and indicates a poverty of the back.

As recently as this week, here's a couple of similar height 45cm was sold in a small European auction for 500 euros (plus 20-something percent, understand ).
Does your height a little more, but one bowl , then some in this range should cost.
While in Russia, the demand for these things " up to $ 1,000 on gifts " as a whole , of course, higher ...

Vase in the style of "OLD PARIS" - a modern remake.
Can easily go for 15 thousand, if someone like much, but maybe for 3000 years .... stand alone how lucky they are .. prices

But why is this a remake ?
Job quality , gold is good, visible almost inevitable for the old stuff tiny loss on the petals of flowers.
Also, although I am not an expert on remakes , as I remember , they always have some kind of " pseudo- stamps."
And where are those years are three thousand [ rubles, I understand ]?

To me this seems a new thing.
All the more so recently passed through the hands of several novodelnyh similar vases in various forms and shapes.
And all were in the style of "OLD PARIS", and offered "no understanding people."
I see China.

Sales can be found here:

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_saca...ld+paris&rt=nc

Porcelain attribute the photo - it is, of course , ungrateful , but what is that thing you " seen the new " is, as it were ... somewhat unfounded.
And the link that you gave , you can see porcelain items , it pretend to China , roughly $ 50 and it is a decent pair of vases - more than 499. Or are they too - remakes ? If - yes, try to bring these pictures of vases that could see the difference.
Although, if the vase from the first post - modern , the differences are so tiny that the shopping china to tie in principle! :)>

ktibq, the first time I turned the photos ...

Next will be removed, and respect members of the forum!

Excuse me, Grigory, do not understand for what reason the claim.

Added after 5 minutes
I wanted to thank AlexSpb, for the information.
It certainly is not a remake, the thing from the collection of Antiquities, which is alive and there is no longer 40 years.
We have never seen the bottom of the bowl, so they themselves were surprised that there was no stigma.
Therefore themselves could not determine whose work this porcelain.

Vase "lay on the side" ...
So see?