Zverev (?)
 

Dear colleagues,


I suggest buying the following work Zvereva:


Portrait, paper /watercolor, 64 x 44 cm


Before showing Silaev, I want to consult with you.


Thank you!

Valery, of course, show, but, in my opinion, does not animals.

There are two portraits collector GN Mikhailova, who Zverev made ​​on the canvas, I saw them. It seems that your portrait made ​​"based on" the portraits ... It does not matter is arranged in a sheet, and "Zverev " handwriting exaggerated ... so I questioned ...

And such is offered ...


Female portrait with black eyes, 50 x 40's., 1980s., Paper /watercolor

Frankly, I do not understand the quality of what is now irrelevant ? If this is the only important signature , you have to buy " only for signature."
Zverev is a portrait or not - terrible quality ...
Of the two portraits , which I mentioned above , one was good , the other bad , both were Zvereva.
When it comes to investments , it is still in the art , that is, in such works, which will be something to report and view and mind many years later, when all will be forgotten, like saws and lived this artist.
In the "easy " technique worked, for example , Constantine Gees ... And now, no matter how he lived, he was charming or not ... And then, when he became famous , it was also important.

advise forget Silaev not shown ....

bykinist,

To.chto not buy and carry Silaev odnoznachno.No spigo ask to see to calm dushi.shansy prada 0

Well this is a horror ! :)> Zverev, of course, was often the influence of alcohol , but it is still always a painter. Even sometimes behave disgracefully, but it is not a disgrace, a disgrace. Ekie poddelschiki shameless suck ...

bykinist, my dear, all crafts.