I.P.Pohitonov?
 

Plagued by vague doubts about the authenticity of the work.
But, it comes bundled with the conclusion of the famous expert!
I do not consider myself an expert on art in general!
Something I saw , I have little experience with products.
But in the authenticity of this work do not.

It is interesting to hear the views of other participants.

I will probably look ridiculous, but nonetheless!

I think that this picture is to be creative Pohitonova IP
has nothing to do!

And if you go on, on the examination, it is better to ........................................
say anything!

:mad:> Oh, this Churak Galina ...
I have her personal claim ...


From the combination of features and style of painting signature also tends not to believe in I.Pohitonova authorship.

uriart,

Especially compared with his work and Pohitonova (about the same size). Nravitsya.net not that "subtlety." And the signature of such rejection does not matter.

If you take it after the new official examination or better not to risk ..

Konerse on this thing passed, but was not sold.

___________________________

I read an expert opinion :
Here are the first two:

Should not be tormented , you 're right again . IS clearly does not have the slightest relation to the creation of Ivan Pavlovich Pohitonova . Ready to testify under oath ! :mad:>
Presented opus - ugly daubs , the mere mention of which next to the name of the great master is th ...... ........ and ........... discrediting his memory!
P.S. Now - according to the laws of classical drama - to appear on stage two artists : He and She. And boring recitative to tell what she Amateur ..... and Hamley . Therefore - the curtain. (I have time to carry out its carcass to the left behind the scenes, and the artist - He and She - draperies do not prevent ...)

Added after 6 minutes
From disturbances forgot to add: Attached footcloth - not commented and discussed.

Incidentally, in that its pile Galina Churak, I personally doubt it.

Forgery are both the work itself and the opinion of an expert .
Pokhitonov wrote in a scholarly manner , the master miniaturist, painting lead up to perfection by " scratching " of certain areas to create the highest -definition images. The photo - impasto painting with paints boldly laid , the signature is applied later in doubt.
Expert opinion - photo and signature - fake (the signature is made with a trembling hand)

That, in general, that is absolutely clear. If I signed it - I would not have that right was shaking and shaking and left to ...
Nothing Ivan Pavlovich, by and large, not scratched. However, Ivan Pavlovich and in a scholarly manner had never worked ...
Here there is not only the "other" details, but "this" and "yonder", and none at all. Even a hint of subtlety not. XXXL here, not "subtlety".
  Pohitonova painting - it's all special song. Ivan Pavlovich - one of the few artists whose work (with rare exceptions) came to us in almost perfect condition. I will not read this lecture on painting technique indicated by the author (to me it is perfectly done I.B.Markevich V.A.Grebenyuk and I just went to the first class), let me bring in a photo a tiny fragment of one of the last I've seen Pohitonova paintings. (I note that this piece - image wagtails - takes on the painted surface area of ​​approximately 1 x 2 mm., And fixed camera, combined with a microscope). Of course, this is - not only the dignity :)> painting Pohitonova; provided me with a single purpose - to make it easier to compare and visually authentic wizard to discuss the proposed u.bischem ...

Thank you all for your feedback!

I was sure that fuflyak!

But out of courtesy wrote that "plagued by vague ......."

And the good news is that the name of the expert is nazapyatnannym.

Amateur, a single heartfelt thanks for tryasogusku !
subscribe to every word ! (even abusive , share feelings)

Generally, by the virtuosity of painting Pohitonova associates (I personally uniquely) with precious enamel.
You can write a wagtail (apparently ) only dvuhvolosnoy brush ( ?)