Landscape painters, Impressionists
 

Dear forum members !

I think many of us seek to not only successfully invest in paintings or other art objects with the prospect of growth, but also to get an aesthetic pleasure of ownership in some piece of art . Put simply want to feast for the eyes and its price over time grew.

This topic has been raised, but there was an educational program on artists other direction. Since I'm interested in the landscape painters , the Impressionists .

So my question to the experts on this forum is:

Let's say if the amount of $ 100,000 , recommend Impressionist landscape of the Soviet period in which you think is washed to invest , and that have a good potential for growth in value. Only interested in oil painting !

Thanks in advance for your reply!

AAPlastov.

AA seams interesting artist, but what confuses a lot of suggestions, but shopping as it is not very much.


What other opinions?

artcol, though interesting view with minimal commentary.

Over the past 6 years Plastov prices are in the range 10 - 25 t $

That is not enough.
 
Even by 2008, not been any trend.

After how long do you think the prices will rise and by how much (as far as this underrated artist)?

Added after 2 minutes
Here in Korovin some experts do not recommend investing in investment purposes, as secondary, and only in the landscapes of the Soviet period is the bigger question.

Constantine, that is best seen as an investment and the vanguard of social realism?

I hope that for 100 , etc. Now you can buy a large classroom Plastov and this classy layers will grow.

Like this:

Вложение 1834891

Artist big, classic. What else from the Soviet Impressionists can be bought for 100 , etc.? Grabar ? Hardly.

UPD Yes, I think that the reservoir is undervalued. But the heirs of this work is about to be corrected.

By the way this question, but in Russia Plastov work somewhere else then exhibited at the auction and if so, how well?

I think more than once.

This year will be a special program Makdugalse type, you can look at the network searches for "makdugals layers Prize".

why heirs ? Sponsor is not named
 "The increase in the prize fund art award Plastov to 500 thousand pounds was due to sponsorship. "
"Layers " brand !

Well, maybe someone else is interested. These nuances I dedicated.

Added after 4 minutes
And the brand, and most importantly -the-art . Just not all brewed this topic (I have, for example, not at all) , but that is their problem, not Plastov ))

Whether the extra money would be - I would have bought some of his studies with portraits. And the landscape of the above type .

And I have another question here : someone can explain sale Savitsky GK for $ 3.5 million ? What was that? Type PR stunt ?