Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   "One feature rating - Issue XV (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=18686)

Stanislav 17.02.2009 20:34

"One feature rating - Issue XV
 
I bought a directory "A single artistic rating, issue number 15, 41076 artists. Dear colleagues, share ideas, feedback about this publication. Ly think you are worthy of the editorial board of the directory to give one or another artist rating? How directory affects the market price of art? Will bring an example for me интерестных rated artists. Thus, Russia's Medvedev artist Katya rated "2A", has joined the company hierarchy AP Narbut GI, with the work of medium-sized listed on Katya from 1000 U.S. dollars, Narbut G. seems expensive budet.A Zurab Tsereteli proigruet Katya 2 pozitsii.Chem justify such high ratings still living artists? Serves a rating tool for the potential art investor?? The handbook also identifies pricing recommendations to the works of rating artists, if you follow these recommendations??

Кирилл Сызранский 17.02.2009 20:48

I own (there was some sort of green) gave a colleague.
What's going on in this rating, you can see?

Sandro 17.02.2009 20:55

I was first or second issue, which were even more nonsense from the indexes.
Do not use and do not react when someone mentions the rating.
Once seen, that is actively used in the state. art galleries (such as Belyaevo ).... but it's not art-Investment ?!.;)

SergeiSK 17.02.2009 21:12

Personally, I am to a rating as a telephone directory, maybe more than forty thousand names of artists. And on the assigned category, there do not have to pay attention, there are more questions than answers. Savely Sorin 4A and immediately, AM Shilov with 2B. And such examples are there on every page. But just as the list of artists he is not bad.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Цитата:

Сообщение от Stanislav (Сообщение 227546)
The guide also identifies pricing recommendations to the works of rating artists, if you follow these recommendations??

There can be no price recommendations. There is a proposal and there is demand, which dictates the market, which in turn is very variable. A compromise between them on price.

17.02.2009 22:18

In one of the topics I spoke about the absurdities single rating:
And you know what NP Glushchenko on a single rating? 4A!

  - How to treat a single rating in the assessment of the Ukrainian artists represented in it? Compare. Glushchenko 4A, Vlasov, Vladimir G. 4B Volokidin Paul Gavrilovich 4A, Tokarev Vyacheslav 4B, Mikhail Ivanovich Zhuk 4A - professional artists, teachers and founders about which creativity has written numerous monographs and works are in hud.muzeyah first magnitude, and Russia .... fan Semynina Ivan Emelianovich 1919g.r. rating 4A.Vot what is known about him - "That's one of those people is Ivan Emelianovich Semynina, a veteran of World War II, the clan of the Don Cossack, 50 years living in Izhevsk, Udmurtia for which became a second home, a military doctor by profession, a poet, artist and musician at the command of the soul ".... that's all. I agree, ratings, subjective thing. But not so zhe.Ved already profanity or conscious humiliation. About Ukrainian-ratings nor slova.Eto pathology in pure form.

Allena 18.02.2009 10:22

Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK (Сообщение 227666)
Personally, I am to a rating to a telephone directory, maybe more than forty thousand names of artists. But just as the list of artists he is not bad.

It is like a list, and actually complete and informative. Just need to keep in mind that the name and surname, as a rule, the drafters did not admit mistakes, but to the middle, and the dates better remain in doubt - a lot of mistakes.

18.02.2009 12:28

Цитата:

Сообщение от Allena (Сообщение 227876)
That's like a list, and actually complete and informative. But one should bear in mind that the names and, as a rule, the drafters did not admit mistakes, but to the middle, and the best dates remain in doubt - a lot of mistakes.

Of course in a reference book, and what the rating is technical errors are not acceptable or should be kept to minimumu.Rech talking about reytengovoy assessment ... because directory is called "Rating". I agree it is not needed for purchases at auctions, known expensive items with expertise, etc. but in everyday life ... As for price-impact of the recommendations are too many factors to rely on the emergence spravochnik.Kstati claims publisher has taken into account and gave the answer in the section "regulations." washed his hands so to speak.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 18:45.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot