N.G.Shilder, Motherhood
 

Good day!

Tell me, please, according to this study.

Best regards!

Novel

For reasons of ethics should probably keep quiet , but - seriously afraid explode.
What does this picture have to do with the works of Nicholas Gustavovich Schilder - probably known only to Mrs. Lapidus.
 And even clubbing spot the similarity "Motherhood" with the above portraits of Alexander III and . Prince. Nikolai authored called master somehow not convinced. :D>

Interestingly, the overall art found between N. Lapidus presented the painting " Motherhood" and Tretyakov "Temptation" but " in the upper side of the chair and other work "?
In my view , it is " Motherhood" is more like some European work towards the end of the century than paper by Schilder 1850 .

Dating masterpiece - mean (!!!) XIX century - also left up to the author zaklyucheniniya ...

Well, colleagues, and you are over the range of "Hammer" laughed!

Unfortunately, in Riga no more authoritative expert on Russian art than N.Lapidus.


Proposals have also been working with the names of no less serious, but still better not hurry with their demonstration.


Thank you for participating in the discussion!

All the same, some credibility with Mrs. Nina Lapidus is, if it helps to Sotheby's or Bonham's:




http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/16883/lot/33/

Perhaps Mrs. N. Lapidus does not even know that it has issued an expert opinion on

NG Schilder?

Do not confuse God's gift to the eggs . It was not discussed authority MRS Lapidus. It discussed the picture attributed N.G.SHILDERA brush . Attributed called expert, and - by the way - without any reason to be . A reputation , alas, does not replace knowledge .
By the way : a statement that the picture can not be provided by the middle of 19th century, does not require any academic degree or special education. Perfectly good sense ...

Seems By right.