A. Bogoluboff
 

What do you think about this watercolor?
Signed "A. Bogoluboff /1856".
Venice, the Doge's Palace and S.Mariya della Salute.
37x52.

macas, a feeling that remake.

"It seems to me - around solid night

Especially because it was so ". (C)

In this case, there must be original ...
I wanted to make a couple - three poor myslishek , yes zarobela : Well , as I hear in response to a threatening rebuke ? That, he says , even the Natalya Ignatova own kind does not allow ! :)>
(By the way : NS itself " does not allow " for the money , and we, if " allow " - that only " pizvazbezdda , that is - dadam " ... :)> :)> :)>
Here I understand , I understand. And what's with " dadam " - no demand, and that corporal punishment in secondary schools have long abolished ... And all one - country -and-a - ashno .

That is natural to compare the signature!

And she had , at sirotinushki , was all alone ... Alexey is in the juvenile company of Marine Corps vowed no other way to subscribe. :)>
And yet, all the same , though. On works from the collections of the State Russian Museum Bogolyubov , TG and Radischevskaya Museum inquisitive gaze true connoisseur :D > can easily distinguish a certain number of options signature of the artist.
This does not mean necessarily that the presented watercolor and is unquestionably the work of AP Bogolyubov . It just means that on the basis of a single argument to conclusions should not ...

Thanks for the comments.
The work is in England.
I join you and also think that it is a remake or a fake.

Here are samples of signatures A. Bogolyubov and all claim to be recognized natural.

And these samples can result set.

Not even a signature.
Can not in this case, the dome to be so cut off (unless it's a bad photo).
And the heads in the crowd everything the same.