Well, let us hooves (horns - the next time)?
 

Yes, today's test we have decided to dedicate konyashkam. Frosik, of course, ask whether nalzya to find horses kiss, but what I answer her that donations to the horse's teeth do not look.
Black and white version solipeds chosen not only to heighten the style, but out of necessity.

And this need for some black and white? And what a passion for dismemberment?:) I'm still on your bloodthirsty ladies feel sick, and now the unfortunate horses - all in pieces.:)

Oh come on, please, horses almost tselenkie!
A black and white as they are attractive enough to grumble and whine, let's - for the machine!

Tomorrow, right? I'd like to see the results of bidding.

Well, I can say straight away with the horses I have better things are:
1.?
2. Goya
3. Uccello
4. Green
5. Mantegna
6. Botticelli
7. Caravaggio
8. ?
9. David
10.Klue
11. Stubbs
12. Francesca
13. ?
14. Degas
15. ?
16. Velazquez
17. Sulfur
18. Delacroix
19. ?
20. Gericault
Next, we must think ...

Super!

Years later ... ten daily tests you all in my sotbiz, Christie's chief experts will work!
And Mr. Tyukhtin now, I suppose, examining: p :);):): p

LCR, so in Mr. Tyukhtin foreign paintings rarely exhibited.
Now, if someone gave an answer here ...
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=17855

Yes we are already Tiesenhausen with his flashlight to hold your belt:):) № 1 Chirico, № 15, Mark, № 19 smahivet heavily on Kandinsky, and number 13 on the step, and Kia - I do not know at all, but the logic then number 8 .
By the definition of authorship landscapes of Soviet artists - it is only them that have the forces on the spirits. Because of this stuff so much that you can circle the globe:) We even among its Samara confused that really govrit other ...

We just today talked about this with Cyril - who would have thought cho zamlya Russian would be so rich landscape by masters? )))))))))

But let us return to our sheep, that is horses. ALO they are all in color