Why not in our section "Erotica"?
 

Indeed, just now saw exactly 200 posts on this forum wrote (rightly accused admins a lot of what and deservedly pulled down - do not count!).
Of course, to compete with the professionals of forum on this issue difficult for me, but still, not too little - more than a hundred a year! I wanted something bright third hundred open.
Well, the main driving point - care attendance favorite forum. To check whether there was a similar topic before, did not even - well, can not believe that such a stalled!
I think that even any subsection of its "Images [something there] in the art" (by analogy with the "skull") could easily have those same skull by popularity ahead! By the way, I'm not afraid to look ridiculous for a long time and I must confess that even the name of the topic read the first time, as "... a member of the images." This is me only to the fact that the plot, as they say, is long overdue and is in the air!
There would have to show me an example - put something sort of ...
But to do this in the first post will not. Why? Well, what I'm not a hero (I - Nigga, oh - like impromptu, could not resist :)>) ... what I'm not a hero, it's obvious. But certainly not as "not a hero" to, as they say - and farted into the bushes. Pleased to support the theme, even something unpublished and may, in fact - to Mother Russia related.
Just think that here in the role "of Default" is right for the hero, who would set the bar for some, after which all further posts were not accessible to any sanctimonious attacks.
For example, to start to put some of Egon Schiele pootkrovennee or famous Courbet (I hope everyone understood what I mean), which is in the Louvre (?) Then hung out for a short time, then again will hide the shame ...
And after that, I'm sure everything is a matter of will-go and as people on this forum, in the vast majority - educated and intelligent, the theme itself should steer in the right direction.

We can argue about the identity of Cyril Syzran and some of its qualities, but to the fact that more than anyone, degree - it defines the face of this forum, I think all would agree. If he does not mind, he would have given me and the honorable right first put something here to your liking. I am sure that everyone (who is not against the topic in general), I would support in this matter!

Why so many excuses, reservations, nodding in the direction of and requests "the bar higher"? Your theme, that sets the bar. Want Schiele, Gustave Courbet - so bet.

And the title of the topic of the bracket is better to remove. If it suddenly becomes popular, the third hundred of the title does not interesting.

For a person with seven hundred ninety one post treat with respect is what is called, by definition, :)>.
However , I note that this is not the issue, and only a suggestion to create one.
A written, You forgive, as best he could , and as you see fit.
Well, what about is not interesting - I advise getting used to - speak for themselves.

I understand that you have opened this thread to suggest a topic Cyril Syzran "Erotica "? :eek:>

For some reason, I think, zarajara, that the subject is you still will not be too interesting.
So should worry about it?

If it becomes ...


By the way, there is a user forum don pedro with a chic collection of " feminine " in which, of course, there is not no Schiele Courbet, that in my opinion does not detract from its merits.

"Feminine " are wonderful, never seen before.
But, that does not become subject to litter in the likeness of famous sections, it might be worth , limit it to spread in the image , for example - the mid-20th century.
By the way, the role of moderator topics 'll take with pleasure ( until you get bored , of course) .
Oh, and I will win back his critics ! :)>

[QUOTE=artcol; 2350631 ] When will ...

By the way, there is a user forum don pedro with a chic collection of [URL="http://forum.artinvestment. ru /album.php? u = 785 " ] " feminine "[/URL] in which, of course , there is not any Shile Courbet, that in my opinion does not detract from its dignity . [/QUOTE]

So I'm about : those which addressed many erotic .

[B]AlexSpb[/B], the point is not the number of posts. Among the members of the forum there are high professionals who rarely come in and join them little. You could not even find them again. If you are interested in this subject , you will not have anyone to call her . Want to - respond , no - the very stall.
I did not mean to hurt you . But imagine: a popular topic , it is a year or two, and called [B]( In the third hundred posts went !) [/​​B]. Just a tip for PR :)>

[size="1"]Added after 4 minutes[/size]

Why, I even wanted to make the album "Erotica in Armenian art" and publications that I already have on the subject.

That section? No topics?
There was, for example , the topic but without vulgarity[/B][/URL], there 's sensuality affected , of course . I'm of the Courbet just put out one day, but it was not an end in itself , it was in the context of some topics, but without me this famous thing in the forum, of course, By the way , I'm not quite clear your topic . Or rather, I did not understand what you want it to be. Works of erotic content ? Any physical love scenes ? Genitals ? What?

Well , well, well , zarajara. Let us seriously. All the different ideas of humor and I do not impose my anyone . Of course , nothing you have not touched . And of course, if he gets the nod to this theme exist , the name should be changed.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 7 minutes[/color]
I do not have specific wishes . As I wrote , if not the first to ask a rigid framework , the theme itself should define themselves . The only thing that I consider it necessary that the theme is not stalled, it's a time limit . Once again strengthened in this opinion , seeing your link to "intimate , but without vulgarity ."

Regarding terminology, " to" , " subject" - I am not strong and can easily be missed. Ask me for it strictly do not judge and do not hesitate to correct .

The " erotic " meant , of course, not Western , " pornographic " sense , and our - the widest .