Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   P.Konchalovsky? Garden in winter. (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=177602)

redbor 13.11.2012 22:41

P.Konchalovsky? Garden in winter.
 
Вложений: 1
Here's another interesting picture P.Konchalovsky.
"The Garden in Winter" in 1935.

Fund does not have a certificate, expert acts not.

A written confirmation grandson PP
Konchalovsky that the picture painted by Konchalovsky and was in the family of the author.
 
Interesting opinions ...

Борис Кон 13.11.2012 22:52

In style as "Flower Garden."
One arm.

Added after 1 minutes
* Perhaps the author was a "band".

redbor 13.11.2012 23:29

What a "band"?
The difference, then between jobs - 5 years

Борис Кон 13.11.2012 23:31

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2338731)
What a "band"?
The difference, then between jobs - 5 years


prolonged :)>

молевич 14.11.2012 00:13

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2338731)
What a "band"?
The difference, then between jobs - 5 years


For example, if you take pictures of Repin, Serov and Vrubel, we can see that the handwriting was not changed from the beginning of the formation of 23 hudozhnika.U Repin, Serov from 18 to 26 in Vrubel.

With uvazh.Vadim

Игорь Гурьев 14.11.2012 05:22

This is similar to Konchalovsky in the foreground.

But the wood artist did not deliver.

I can not imagine that the PP
so wrote.

It could do, say, later, Volodya Pereyaslavets which he had studied.


On the back of a room?

молевич 17.11.2012 09:58

To be honest, he did not deliver anything else.

тата 17.11.2012 22:31

7-8 years ago had an affair with the works of Mikhail Konchalovsky, among them was a small job winter 1935. So, at first glance it was very similar to the work of Peter Petrovich. Kindly gave me a job back home think. Hang it on the wall, just a few hours realized that it is not a masterpiece . In the works of Mikhail no technical freedom and improvisation , energy inherent to some extent the work of PP As for the room at the back , in my experience, there were 2 good work Konchalovsky without it, one of which was published in the resonator .
Judging from the photo , it can be who be of Konchalovsky , and not a Pereyaslavets, Candlemas , etc. Of course we must look alive, would be much easier to understand . To begin to examine the signature in the ultraviolet.

redbor 17.11.2012 23:51

Цитата:

Сообщение от Igor Guryev, 2339061
On the back of a room

Yes, of course, № 1183.
 
About the work MP
Konchalovsky, of course I know, and this work was immediately inclined to consider his work, despite the assurances of his grandson.
 
But recently there have been a strong case for the fact that it is a picture of the PP
:)>

Игорь Гурьев 18.11.2012 04:43

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2345891)
edavno there were strong arguments for the fact that it is a picture of the pp

You know, bad pictures, happened, wrote almost all of the artists from the 17th century, except, perhaps, Vermeer and Velasquez.
Well, Chardin and Guardi.
Maybe even F. Basile.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 05:36.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot