The painting "Spring Fun", who is the author?
 

All the good days!
42.5h63sm size , x /m The frame of a pencil 51.g. On the back of the canvas : Spring Fun and a word not legible , perhaps the author's name .
 Picture without the restoration has a clear homogeneous time craquelure (see two photos on a bright searchlight clearance) . The signature in the lower right corner of VB48 , in cracks craquelure black paint does not, then the signature is applied to his education, which gives a chance pologayu that the signature is authentic.
Please help with the definition of authorship. Thank you all.

dop.foto ........

Kirill1974, is a sub-frame (no frame) :)

And it's like?


Strange some craquelure as induced krakelyurnym varnish.

There is not exactly on the frame 51, I took it, it was stashnenkaya, bronzyankoy painted (see photo), part bronzanki left in the picture (painted without removing from the picture).

Добавлено через 14 минут
With krakelyurnym varnish I came across this is not it . A searchlight on clearance :), seen as an old antiquarian delal.S reverse side put a bright light and look uniform layer, craquelure , etc., ie the area where uniformity renovating another and often no craquelure.
Add photos in daylight. When the frame was shot many centuries of dirt ( dust, lechinok , etc.). Perhaps now varnished , not argue .
Painting bought is not expensive, it does not sell well-known author .

Добавлено через 1 минуту
Photo pictures to the frame.

With krakelyurnym varnish I came across this is not it . A searchlight on clearance :)>, seen as an old antiquarian delal.S reverse side put a bright light and look uniform layer, craquelure , etc., ie the area where uniformity renovating another and often no craquelure.
Add photos in daylight. When the frame was shot many centuries of dirt ( dust, lechinok , etc.). Perhaps now varnished , not argue .
Painting bought is not expensive, it does not sell well-known author .

Photo pictures to the frame.

Dear Cyril,
craquelure on your picture so " clear and uniform " that the " temporary" nature of it is eliminated completely. This is not due to craquelure natural aging of the paint layer , and a purely technological reasons . (Most likely - the nature of the soil) .
The picture itself - very nice. If I were a director of the museum ... :) ( Alas, the ruble - a hundred : soon there will certainly arise giganstkaya figure in white robes , and the thunder of heaven announce that lovely scene with boats embarks rural pioneers copy of picture of the People's Artist of the USSR such and such rastakaya something ...
P.S. Signature looks very strange. ..

Thank you for your opinion.

similar to the mass production of any hud.kombinata for rural clubs and houses of Pioneers


earlier, this "art" hung in every public place and was called "visual propaganda"