Icon, help with the attribution and evaluation
 

Hello!
These icons were ponovleny , suppose that in the 19th century. After the disclosure of the top layer were found images of Jesus and John the Baptist from the Deesis .
There is also an icon of the Virgin, but I think the value is not there, because after trying to open an earlier layer was not. Apparently, it was just to add in a number of later? Initially to clearing all the icons looked like this Virgin.
In all the icons on the back is scrawled signature.
about the size of icons odinakovye6 51h41sm , board thickness : 3 cm.
Dear experts, I would like to hear your opinion.

Lucky.

A photo before opening you have.
It would be interesting to see.

Fed, the photo to the disclosure, unfortunately, no.
but the icons were the same letters over as Virgin.
It was a rough letter, very conventional.

This is not a signature, and the name of the customer renovations.

Very lucky. Of course, these photos do not give a complete picture .
Gallida, deystvaitelno If , as you described, I think, the icon of the Savior and the Baptist can be attributed to the Moscow school. first half of the 18th century. ( a following of S.Ushakovu )
 The image of the Virgin - the trouble is , the face is almost lost ( but good restorer have work to do ) icon of the Virgin , of course was not complete , but it can fit in this range.

How much are these three icons together?
Subject to the mid 18th century creation.
under the influence of the Armory.

evaluate them as yet.
Experts will be looking not virtual.