Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   I.Klyun? Your opinion? (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=168082)

maksot2011 24.08.2012 11:21

I.Klyun? Your opinion?
 
Вложений: 5
Hello
This can be a real picture?
Sold in Canada, the seller said he bought it from a wealthy Russian immigrants.
What is your opinion.
Thank you all responded!

Тютчев 24.08.2012 15:20

In 1993, Svetlana Klyunkova - Catalogue Raisonné Soloveitchik published works of Ivan Cluny.
It has a similar signature.
But similar.
I do not like the letter "K".
And push some unnatural.
I would not take it.
And there, see the catalog and decide for yourself.

Кирилл Сызранский 24.08.2012 15:25

Цитата:

Сообщение от Tyutchev, 2218801
And there, see the catalog and decide for yourself.

Look, but keep in mind:

Цитата:

Сообщение от qwerty (Сообщение 88615)
Svetlana Klyunkova wrong quite often, and even released her book of common misconceptions.


Тютчев 24.08.2012 15:34

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran (Сообщение 2218811)
See, but keep in mind:


Signature of the most similar to this in the catalog, I saw only one picture, dated 1930 year.
Wrong or not wrong Klyunkova, in this case, does not matter.

Кирилл Сызранский 24.08.2012 15:50

Цитата:

Сообщение от Tyutchev, 2218861
are wrong or not wrong Klyunkova, in this case, does not matter.

It does matter when you read this:

Цитата:

Сообщение от Tyutchev, 2218801
In 1993, Svetlana Klyunkova - Catalogue Raisonné Soloveitchik published works of Ivan Cluny.


Тютчев 24.08.2012 16:02

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran (Сообщение 2218871)
This makes sense when you read this :

In general , this opinion is interesting. How to view catalog -reason . I can not prove it , do not deny, but it is not relevant to this particular case , since the proposed item is not included in the number of published in the catalog.

sergejnowo 24.08.2012 17:36

terribly sorry, painting Mr. Klyun do not understand, but ...

The naked eye can see that work is signed "the day before yesterday," gnarled hand and very different, in tone and firmness of a pencil.

maksot2011 26.08.2012 12:37

Цитата:

Сообщение от sergejnowo; 2219011"
terribly sorry , painting Mr. Klyun do not understand, but ...
The naked eye can see that work is signed " the day before yesterday ," gnarled hand and very different, in tone and firmness of a pencil .

thank you all commented on the report ! Yes, I also think the signature set later. but that is also found on the authenticity of the works. Dear friends, there is a specialist in Cluny, which could set the record straight ?
 Do you think the cost of a such a figure ?

redbor 26.08.2012 12:44

Цитата:

Сообщение от maksot2011 (Сообщение 2221901)
I also think the signature set later.
but that is also found on the authenticity of the works.

If you mean the real work, the author of the signature in 100 years does not make

qwerty 28.08.2012 07:21

Цитата:

Сообщение от maksot2011 (Сообщение 2221901)
thank you all commented on the report ! Yes, I also think the signature set later. but that is also found on the authenticity of the works. Dear friends, there is a specialist in Cluny, which could set the record straight ?
 Do you think the cost of a such a figure ?

Pattern is very similar to what Klyun did on stage apprenticeship in 1900-1901 gg. and career decline after 1928 Signature likely set by someone else. Collection value figure is not as avant-garde works Klyun prized 10 's - 20's . Instead realistoicheskimi peyzazhikami . In my view, the normal price of this sketch in the 1000 U.S. MNT (after examination, of course).


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 20:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot