Vasilkovsky 1887
 

Original.Bez restoration.
The size of 58h72 with baguette see 89h103 see

A typical late 19th-century Europe.
Signature top red layer and varnish.

Vasilkovsky
 

You know, " my dear Molevich " before making such " reasoning " , it is necessary - " grow up " for such a good painting .

Posted 8 minutes
You know, I'm not going to " fight on the forehead descend ," but I will tell you so : I have a job , " Aivazovsky " with attribution , was made ​​in 200 ? year. "Draw " I will not! But I can tell you this: it is now put in your auction, without " papers ", you would say the same thing ! That " such Aivazovsky " in Russia - a dime a dozen ! What is a " copy" is not very good quality !
 My advice to you before you say , think!

I have nowhere to grow and I will say that Molevich is absolutely right.
Even when he (Molevich) retires, this picture SI
Vasilkovsky will not.

Matrenushka, in vain offended.

In the painting Vasilkovskaja not seem at all.

Do not trust written, I mean my eyes!

If you are so sure that you have a genuine S.Vasilkovsky put a real price for this size of 200 tis ye.


http://molotok.ru/vasilkovskij-1881-...468730631.html

A.
Painting is my agree?

Two.
I, for how much I want to expose as much, right?

Three.
I'm somewhere, "said" that is "the very Vasilkovsky?"

Be careful!

Molevich, why only 200?

Where have you seen such prices for his work?

Prices, and photos of major rush for two pennies!
Is not it possible that you can not do the normal and high-quality pictures because it affects the real opinion!

I said, in general.

I do not even remember the sales Vasilkovskaja work of this size.