Prompt
 

Offered a job with expertise Muraveva 1902 Artkolsanting.

Confirmation time napisaniya.podtverzhdenie time signature.

But really there is no evidence of authorship or signature?
Stranno.Eto.chto their usual practice?

Who has them ekspertzy 5.4 years ago. Podkazhite.

mihailovoh, the question of authorship - art criticism are examined.
And you have - technological (such as exploring materials in terms of their physical and chemical properties).
This is essentially two different services.

Yes, you rightly understood. This is their usual practice. For the author do not warrant , and affirm only that type of thing is old ...

Many come across such examinations. Then it is not clear why they are generally given them. After all, in other expert organizations test and the degree of aging of materials, and establish authorship .

Obviously you ordered , and technological expertise is reflected in the act of its result.
If a customer orders in the art consulting attribution of an object or
 examination of art history in order to establish authorship,
he gets the result and the act .
If you prefer, you can discuss the name of an expert.

In " Artkonsaltinge " huge loss for the owners - is that the technological and artistic expertise are as it were, apart. That is, you first pay the money (about a thousand dollars) for the conduct of technological expertise , and then on the basis of the results is carried out art criticism . If art criticism is not intended to confirm the authorship , then the hands will only process the results . And the money to you, of course, no one for her return .
Other expert organizations are spending review in the complex and do not take the full cost of examination in case of failure attributsii .