Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Help to understand - Falk? (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=1556)

Gnat Burnash 02.07.2008 17:29

Help to understand - Falk?
 
Вложений: 5
Hello,

Could you tell whether this pattern is similar to R. Falk. For me as similar, but there are doubts. I would appreciate your answers, if you will help the beginner. If you do not like or you have doubts, write what. And what the price of this painting can be? Painting is in private collections and offer to buy

Gnat Burnash 02.07.2008 17:38

Вложений: 2
Here are photos

qwerty 02.07.2008 18:00

Gnat Burnash, at first glance - "not very. Not so long ago gallery Elysium released catalog-Falk reason, it is sold in the gallery, you can browse and compare. Actually, I'm 80 percent sure that this is not Falk.

Gnat Burnash 02.07.2008 21:46

qwerty, than at first glance, it does not Falk? that bother you? canvas? frame? signature? catalog - it is good, but not all pictures can be included in the catalog. For Falk could paint a picture and give it to private ownership .. and hung it there until it was decided to sell .. and will not be in its catalog

uriart 03.07.2008 06:25

Falk
 
Here's looking at the backdrop of the work itself I can say that the painting was somewhere in Europe? For nails and wire. There is almost always make such anchorages.
And if you work out, you must be very cautious and careful. There is so much bullshit, the mind is not understandable!
And stretcher confusing, it seems that the applied aging?

And you do not adjust themselves to the fact that it might not be in the directory. Look.
Show the experts. Listen to their views. Make a chemical analysis of the paint layer, then it will be clear while writing the work. And so just for lovers of painting in this forum, you will not receive full confidence in the authenticity of work.

Here we need a normal examination.

dedulya37 03.07.2008 08:02

Gnat Burnash, I fully agree with uriart that because of the hill is a lot of bullshit.
Nevertheless, it is hoped that the work can be "correct", I already was.
Catalog-reason is a good thing, but as it is the relatives (if left) helped!
Good luck, although the screws and wires I also do not like, now we are also sold.

uriart 03.07.2008 08:14

Exactly fastening wire is very typical of European sales
Here's something inside of myself does not agree with me that the work is authentic.
Yes, and this craquelure some baked.

Евгений 06.07.2008 07:32

Gnat Burnash, Despite skepticism about the picture, you do not need to worry, it's just personal opinion of the forum.
You need a more serious approach to the attribution of this kartiny.I should begin, perhaps with the gallery "Elysium" (this may be not free, but more realistic).

Тютчев 19.09.2008 08:07

No doubt this is bullshit! Made by Falk. It does not work doge his many disciples. Falk great and honest artist. It's a very poor job. Of course, he wrote a different quality stuff, but it is always art. There is no need to show anyone else was, except that only for self. Yes and no is the connoisseurs of his work. Go and see for yourself his work (as there is much) in G.T.G. at the Crimean waterfront, and you'll understand what I'm talking about. Robert Falk penetrates to the heart, in his paintings there is always something that makes it proizveddeniya special.

uriart 19.09.2008 08:50

100%agree with Tyutchev!
Well, no it "the spark of God, that He gave each of the master!


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 20:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot