Your opinion.
 

Please give an opinion and appreciate this picture.
1972.
Thank you!

In what sense is assessed?


There are two of them - and the second, which is behind - what?

HOOD.
EVALUATION AND MAT.
EVALUATION.

Added after 1 minutes
OR: I like it, do not like and why.
Thank you.

And you, why someone else's opinion?

I checked my matches with others or not.
It is interesting to me is important.

Added after 1 minutes
And yet, offer to buy, I want to understand the level of prices.
Workshop hazel.

Everything is written, the story, multi-figure.
It's like dignity.
A deficiencies (although this is contrary virtues mb /characteristics of style?): Art does not shine (even socialist realism), the figure also, the plot is standard.

Everything does not shine.
On the need to make a thing , stylized 60th year , the illustration to the prose of the "village " as a "people's " naive, clumsily covering the composition , a bad painting . The thing is semi- amateur at all, and by the way , quickly on some already prescribed canvas is made - do not characterize the work in a positive aspect.

*********************
But , Barvikha, accept that someone can and pour the water rose , wringing her hands and rolling his eyes : " Oh, it is absolutely wonderful, full of some inexplicable charm ".
 :D>

I like it.
Caught scent of the era.

Some provincial artist, perhaps?

And what is this story?
Where, suddenly , on a rural street, so many people ? ( in the village so much , and not live )
People are very different professions and social status , everyone has some premeasure attribute ( or the? )
 And, if so where and geese, and chickens and a dog , why not chasing geese dog ?
Some confusion . It does not happen ...

Certainly not the case. But there is such a thing as artistic convention ( although this is not the case ) ... The plot - came home on leave or have already - to leave. In everyday use such a story - plop plop , and the exhibition ... :D>