The picture is not Shishkin?
 

Dear forum users!

Please look at the picture.

Your opinion about the originality of the work?

Screen Format: 500 * 700

Thank you!

levkor, printed materials.

Print or Print . Thank you!
This time even for the overall development if it is printed, then there must be an original - source ? Or am I mistaken ? The catalogs of such a picture I found ? (There may be looking for is not there? I am no expert in this matter ...)
 And please , tell me : printed materials was carried out earlier in watercolor ?

If we do free assessment ...

Shishkin wrote in a different manner.

And really imagine a lady with rebyatenkom in landscape gardening in Shishkin, I do not do that.


Not to mention that this is a faded reproduction.

Many thanks to all!

The truth is always the same ...

A pity, that Santa Claus does not exist :(>

Printed carried out ink .
And what has this watercolor ? You predpalagaete that this work is done in watercolor ?

And again, look carefully at the signature - that is, to me, is made by hand with paint.

Unfortunately, I can not assume because of their incompetence.
It said all the same art.
Grandfather of the owner covered it with pictures painted some furniture, for posterity and in the frame zafigachil :D>